30 Apr
2013
30 Apr
'13
7:42 a.m.
On 2013-04-30 08:27:23 -0400, Jim Alles <kb3tbx(a)gmail.com>
wrote in <CABS3LnJ7KE4DwUJpZzYk=DjDOXgNCtw8CojDO969AbLkWg5fvg(a)mail.gmail.com>om>:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
Could we request that this block be included in
RFC1918?
Why should we offer parts of our netblock to the world? NO! ;)
I've not followed the full discussion (due to lack of time). Considering
NAT-behind-NAT problems, you may find the following quite new assigned RFC/network
useful:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrier-grade_NAT
The scenario and the problems with carrier grade NAT are described quite beautiful in
this article
http://chrisgrundemann.com/index.php/2011/nat444-cgn-lsn-breaks/
The network is 100.64.0.0/10
I hope I hit the point. If not, sorry.
vy 73,
- Thomas dl9sau