On 2013-04-30 08:27:23 -0400, Jim Alles kb3tbx@gmail.com wrote in CABS3LnJ7KE4DwUJpZzYk=DjDOXgNCtw8CojDO969AbLkWg5fvg@mail.gmail.com:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages) _______________________________________________
Could we request that this block be included in RFC1918?
Why should we offer parts of our netblock to the world? NO! ;)
I've not followed the full discussion (due to lack of time). Considering NAT-behind-NAT problems, you may find the following quite new assigned RFC/network useful: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrier-grade_NAT
The scenario and the problems with carrier grade NAT are described quite beautiful in this article http://chrisgrundemann.com/index.php/2011/nat444-cgn-lsn-breaks/
The network is 100.64.0.0/10
I hope I hit the point. If not, sorry.
vy 73, - Thomas dl9sau