20 Jun
2015
20 Jun
'15
8:38 a.m.
Hi,
Frankly, there's been so much back and forth that
I don't know what's
expected any more. As I understand it, some nodes are on the IPIP mesh,
some not. Some are reachable through amprgw, some not. What a mess.
If the debate is over and there is consensus on a standard gateway
architecture, then someone needs to publish it.
+1 ; on the light of the new 'portal.ampr.org' how should be the
'standard' for an amprnet gateway?
I'm thinking the design should include a diagram
of how to address the
interfaces (which tunnels need AMPR addresses, which don't), where NATing
occurs, what the ampr routing table should look like, what the ip rules
should look like, etc.
Furthermore, since the 'ampr-ripd' server is the 'de facto' standard
mean to accomplish the basic IPIP job, is it possible to get it configurable
by filling the option data to join the hamwan.org and other unreachable
BGP announced networks?
73, gus i0ojj