Hi,
Frankly, there's been so much back and forth that I don't know what's expected any more. As I understand it, some nodes are on the IPIP mesh, some not. Some are reachable through amprgw, some not. What a mess.
If the debate is over and there is consensus on a standard gateway architecture, then someone needs to publish it.
+1 ; on the light of the new 'portal.ampr.org' how should be the 'standard' for an amprnet gateway?
I'm thinking the design should include a diagram of how to address the interfaces (which tunnels need AMPR addresses, which don't), where NATing occurs, what the ampr routing table should look like, what the ip rules should look like, etc.
Furthermore, since the 'ampr-ripd' server is the 'de facto' standard mean to accomplish the basic IPIP job, is it possible to get it configurable by filling the option data to join the hamwan.org and other unreachable BGP announced networks?
73, gus i0ojj