Re: [44net] An anniversary of a sort - 36 years

On Sep 5, 2017, at 4:03 PM, Jim MacKenzie <jim(a)photojim.ca> wrote: In fairness, that was true of IPv4 when we got 44net. I for one would be in favour of us having an IPv6 allocation. Not all ISPs that support IPv6 give /64 subnets, so not all users of IPv6 get the advantages that it's supposed to provide. Jim VE5EIS -----Original Message----- From: 44Net [mailto:44net-bounces+jim=photojim.ca@hamradio.ucsd.edu] On Behalf Of Steve L Sent: Monday, September 4, 2017 12:36 AM To: 44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu Subject: Re: [44net] An anniversary of a sort - 36 years There has been some casual discussions from foreign hams to try and get an IPv6 allocation for ham radio from RIPE ( I believe).. but there will be so many addresses available I am not even sure ham radio needs its own allocation. _________________________________________ 44Net mailing list 44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net