I think you meant /48’s or at least a /63 -- a /64 is meant to be the smallest subnet -- it is not meant to be sub-divided any further. Because some ISPs are allocating /64’s to their customers, I also think a ham-radio allocation would be good.
-- Scott -- WA6BLF
On Sep 5, 2017, at 4:03 PM, Jim MacKenzie jim@photojim.ca wrote:
In fairness, that was true of IPv4 when we got 44net.
I for one would be in favour of us having an IPv6 allocation. Not all ISPs that support IPv6 give /64 subnets, so not all users of IPv6 get the advantages that it's supposed to provide.
Jim VE5EIS
-----Original Message----- From: 44Net [mailto:44net-bounces+jim=photojim.ca@hamradio.ucsd.edu] On Behalf Of Steve L Sent: Monday, September 4, 2017 12:36 AM To: 44net@hamradio.ucsd.edu Subject: Re: [44net] An anniversary of a sort - 36 years
There has been some casual discussions from foreign hams to try and get an IPv6 allocation for ham radio from RIPE ( I believe).. but there will be so many addresses available I am not even sure ham radio needs its own allocation.
44Net mailing list 44Net@hamradio.ucsd.edu http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net