Yeah and theres AREDN too. Tried to contact the supposedly "locals" over
the years to no avail.
leon wa4zlw
On 6/16/2019 6:17 PM, vk2tv wrote:
Those bands have been used for high capacity amateur
links for at
least a couple of decades on at least one band. This page might get
you searching further afield ...
http://www.broadband-hamnet.org/
This video (or others like it) might pique your curiosity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99H6z5rmvco
I live in a regional area with no hope of being able to get involved
in the technology, but that doesn't lessen my interest.
Ray vk2tv
On 17/6/19 1:07 am, Leon Zetekoff wrote:
hi there...sound good but why aren't we using
2.4 or 5g for high
bandwidth backhauls? The hardware is cheap enough and works well.
73 Leon wa4zlw Blandon, PA
On 6/16/2019 10:40 AM, pete M via 44Net wrote:
To:
AMPRNet working group <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org>
A big thank you for that effort. This will surely start a new boom
in "packet radio" in north America. I for one will push to implement
the fastest links to our audio links back bones that is all in uhf
for our emergency net . That way we will work in Voip rather then
analog voice opening the way to many more service at the same time .
Télécharger Outlook pour Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net