25 Aug
2013
25 Aug
'13
3:06 a.m.
The tunnel interface is a gateway to the rest of the class A network.
You have to allow this by setting a netmask of netmask 255.0.0.0
An your second ethernet interface to your radio LAN, you may set a
smaller netmask.
Steve
25 Aug
25 Aug
3:39 a.m.
New subject: (no subject)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 24/08/2013 22:06, kb9mwr(a)gmail.com wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________ The tunnel
interface is a gateway to the rest of the class A network. You have
to allow this by setting a netmask of netmask 255.0.0.0
An your second ethernet interface to your radio LAN, you may set a
smaller netmask.
Only true if you're using the amprd encapsulation and routing daemon.
For all other cases the tunl0 interface is defined without a remote
host ip address, setting the mask to 255.0.0.0 might bypass the static
routes setup via rip44d or encap.txt or any other way. Connected
routes usually have a higher preference than static routes. So unless
you're using the new amprd, usage of netmask 255.0.0.0 might result in
issues contacting non-local AMPR subnets.
In the style of your description from above, the tunl0 is not the
gateway to the AMPR network 44.0.0.0/8 as the tunl0 is setup without a
remote host address. As such the tunl0 interface will allow you to
reach exactly 0 hosts within the AMPRnet without the routes created by
rip44d or other means. With rip44d the gateway is provided via the
routes added to the kernel routing table.
73 de Marc, LX1DUC
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=aqa2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
26 Aug
26 Aug
2:57 p.m.
New subject: (no subject)
On Sat, 24 Aug 2013, Marc, LX1DUC wrote:
For all other cases the tunl0 interface is defined
without a remote
host ip address, setting the mask to 255.0.0.0 might bypass the static
routes setup via rip44d or encap.txt or any other way. Connected
routes usually have a higher preference than static routes.
Only if the routes have the same prefix-length. Otherwise longest match
wins is still the rule.
So unless you're using the new amprd, usage of
netmask 255.0.0.0 might
result in issues contacting non-local AMPR subnets.
How many non-local AMPR subnets do you know of that have a prefix
length of 8 or less? :)
Antonio Querubin
e-mail: tony(a)lavanauts.org
xmpp: antonioquerubin(a)gmail.com
29 Aug
29 Aug
12:44 a.m.
New subject: (no subject)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
If a route is missing the local connected route 44.0.0.0/8 will have a
higher priority than the static route 44.0.0.0/8 via UCSD, resulting
in the inability to reach those networks for which a direct route is
missing.
See comment above.
73 de Marc, LX1UDC
For all other
cases the tunl0 interface is defined without a
remote host ip address, setting the mask to 255.0.0.0 might
bypass the static routes setup via rip44d or encap.txt or any
other way. Connected routes usually have a higher preference than
static routes.
Only if the routes have the same prefix-length. Otherwise longest
match wins is still the rule. So unless
you're using the new amprd, usage of netmask 255.0.0.0
might result in issues contacting non-local AMPR subnets.
How many non-local AMPR subnets do you know of that have a prefix
length of 8 or less? :) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=RIrL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
4134
days inactive
4138
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Antonio Querubin -
kb9mwr＠gmail.com -
Marc, LX1DUC