Subject:
Re: [44net] Bad MX records in the
ampr.org DNS
From:
Brian Kantor <Brian(a)UCSD.Edu>
Date:
06/02/2015 04:08 AM
To:
AMPRNet working group <44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu>
There are seven
AMPR.ORG and 44.in-addr DNS servers located around the
world. The chance that all of them will be down at once is close to zero.
We allow people to AXFR their content so it is perfectly possible
to have a redundant DNS server on your local net which can answer queries
regarding those zones even if you are partitioned from the Internet somehow.
Indeed... I don't see a reason to have a private nameserver for a subdomain either.
The
ampr.org nameserver works well, it allows updates, maybe the only thing that could
be nice is the ability to set TXT and other records. Having a subdomain just makes
things
more complex.
The only reason I did a replication of the zone is that a local amateur who is running a
newscast was telling the world that one of the advantages of AMPRnet/HAMNET is that
it would continue to work when Internet was down. I explained him that it is not that
straightforward as we depend on Internet services, most notably DNS.
I thought a bit and decided to load the
ampr.org zone in a nameserver on our gateway
that already is working as a caching resolver for our 44.137.0.0/16 subnet. I think now
it will resolve
ampr.org names even without a connection (although I have not fully tested
that
yet). Of course only those names that are in the
ampr.org zone, not those that are below
a subdomain served by some other server. But we cannot cache the entire world's DNS,
and only the
ampr.org zone should be sufficient to connect most wellknown systems.
I did not use AXFR, I download the zone from
ftp://hamradio.ucsd.edu/pub/ampr.tar.gz
Both methods have their advantages/disadvantages, I think.
Rob