Subject:
Re: [44net] Gateways with external address in net-44
From:
Brian <n1uro(a)n1uro.ampr.org>
Date:
11/12/2014 02:07 PM
To:
AMPRNet working group <44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu>
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 10:16 +0100, Rob Janssen wrote:
>Ok, but then I think those gateway entries
should not be distributed via RIP.
>When they are directly routable, should we use a tunnel to reach them?
That's only half the equasion. The other half is when one is SAFed
(Source Address FilterED) and they policy route 44/8 via their tunnel
interface, and anything else via UCSD...
Yes that is the problem. I need to policy route on source address because of SAF
and I use a separate routing table for the tunnels with a default to UCSD. This fails
with
that 44.24.240/20 with gateway 44.24.221.1 network.
We are building a gateway for 44.137.0.0/16 which in fact has already been running since
the summer but the process of getting the provider to agree to route BGP has taken much
longer than anticipated. Anyway, this gateway (which of course is not affected by SAF
itself)
has a separate public IP (194.109.64.198) for use by the IPIP tunnels to other gateways.
I think that is a better method, it avoids lots of confusion and complicated policy
routing
rules.
Maybe the routing will work again once we have our country gateway up and running
with BGP and direct outbound routing of net-44 traffic (without having to tunnel to
UCSD).
I plan to work out a routing configuration without separate net-44 routing table at that
time.
Rob