On 17/06/20 06:51, Dave Gingrich via 44Net wrote:
I am not sure what you mean by feared, but no, my
allocations are not supporting the AMPRnet per se. If by AMPRnet you mean the legacy BBS
style network of gateways and tunnels. I am issuing OpenVPN certs to provide public IP
addresses to IRLP voice repeaters, where public IPs are troublesome to get, such as where
cellular access to the Internet with private IP is the only thing available. Parts of the
IRLP infrastructure are in 44-land, including
server4.irlp.net in Sydney or
server3.irlp.net in Chicago. It is absolutely 100% Ham Radio. But I wouldn’t call it
AMPRnet in the legacy or traditional sense. I have had these allocations for over 5 years
(Australia less than that).
I have two allocations. One is dedicated to IRLP and
Echolink services
- the vast bulk of those IPs are being used for a bunch of Echolink
proxies, with some IRLP and D-STAR infrastructure also making use of
this block.
The other I use here, and plan on putting some of that to RF in some
form (packet radio, higher speed data, etc). The parts not on air are
supporting infrastructure that's running here.
I've got nothing against providing DNS information, beyond having a
convenient means of doing so. As both of my allocations are /24s,
running my own reverse DNS is feasible, and I have servers I can set the
zones up on already, and am considering that option.
--
73 de Tony VK3JED/VK3IRL
http://vkradio.com