Hello,
New to the list although I do have some JNOS experiences from 12+ years ago. FIrstly, I seem to have volunteered myself as co-ordinator for amprnets in my part of the UK - 44.131.[56-62] so I'd like to thank my predecessor John G1HTL for his efforts over the past couple of decades.
I'm trying to discover what the best practice is for routing 44net traffic based upon what I can see in the encap file. Presumably each one of these is a tunnel, what would be defined in Cisco-speak as "tunnel mode nos" (protocol 94)?
I'm experimenting here with the G8PZT Xrouter software which runs under dos and provides ip connectivity to radio links. I have a spare Cisco 1721 that I've connected to Xrouter with a SLIP link to the aux port on the router and once I figure out how to get encap routing up and running I may be able to provide 44net access via a radio port (subject to UK licensing of course ) .
I'm interested to know what other folks are using to route 44net over the internet?
Regards, Nick.
Nick, I'm terminating all tunnels in the encap.txt to a 2651xm and making back end tunnels to jnos for my ip-rf bridge. The 1721 can handle a few tunnels (300 is the interface limit), but not the entire encap list. I wrote a perl script that will convert the encap.txt into a router config, but I wouldn't try it on anything less than a 2600 (due to config size limitations), and a 2651xm preferably for performance reasons. Let me know if you are interested in the script (its still pretty rough). I'd like to see your AUX config for slip. I'm running my tunnels as ipip instead of nos, I don't know if there is a reason to still use nos. Jason - KY9J
Actually, ampr encap uses proto 4 (IPIP), proto 94 being obsolete.
73s de Marius, YO2LOJ
-----Original Message----- From: 44net-bounces+marius=yo2loj.ro@hamradio.ucsd.edu [mailto:44net-bounces+marius=yo2loj.ro@hamradio.ucsd.edu] On Behalf Of Nick G4IRX (44.131) Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 02:39 To: 44net@hamradio.ucsd.edu Subject: [44net] Encap tunnels
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages) _______________________________________________ Hello,
New to the list although I do have some JNOS experiences from 12+ years ago. FIrstly, I seem to have volunteered myself as co-ordinator for amprnets in my part of the UK - 44.131.[56-62] so I'd like to thank my predecessor John G1HTL for his efforts over the past couple of decades.
I'm trying to discover what the best practice is for routing 44net traffic based upon what I can see in the encap file. Presumably each one of these is a tunnel, what would be defined in Cisco-speak as "tunnel mode nos" (protocol 94)?
I'm experimenting here with the G8PZT Xrouter software which runs under dos and provides ip connectivity to radio links. I have a spare Cisco 1721 that I've connected to Xrouter with a SLIP link to the aux port on the router and once I figure out how to get encap routing up and running I may be able to provide 44net access via a radio port (subject to UK licensing of course ) .
I'm interested to know what other folks are using to route 44net over the internet?
Regards, Nick.
_________________________________________ 44Net mailing list 44Net@hamradio.ucsd.edu http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
howdy all, have been looking into inter-operability of INP3 with netrom quality-based routing, and see there has been work done for older kernels but cannot find anything recent: http://sharon.pi8zaa.ampr.org/users/pe1rxq/inp3.html
Maiko has ported this code to jnos I believe, but I don't see any linux-native ports of the code more recent than kernel 2.6.4...I'm running linux mint 10 and mint 13 in my machines, and the kernel is much newer, haven't tried the patch yet on the newer 3.0+ kernels, anyone had any experience with this? Cheers, John
-
Jason R Begley -
JJ -
Marius Petrescu -
Nick G4IRX (44.131)