4 Nov
2012
4 Nov
'12
7:39 p.m.
Hello,
New to the list although I do have some JNOS experiences from 12+ years
ago. FIrstly, I seem to have volunteered myself as co-ordinator for
amprnets in my part of the UK - 44.131.[56-62] so I'd like to thank my
predecessor John G1HTL for his efforts over the past couple of decades.
I'm trying to discover what the best practice is for routing 44net
traffic based upon what I can see in the encap file. Presumably each one
of these is a tunnel, what would be defined in Cisco-speak as "tunnel
mode nos" (protocol 94)?
I'm experimenting here with the G8PZT Xrouter software which runs under
dos and provides ip connectivity to radio links. I have a spare Cisco
1721 that I've connected to Xrouter with a SLIP link to the aux port on
the router and once I figure out how to get encap routing up and running
I may be able to provide 44net access via a radio port (subject to UK
licensing of course ) .
I'm interested to know what other folks are using to route 44net over
the internet?
Regards,
Nick.
4 Nov
4 Nov
9:06 p.m.
Nick,
I'm terminating all tunnels in the encap.txt to a 2651xm and making
back end tunnels to jnos for my ip-rf bridge. The 1721 can handle a few
tunnels (300 is the interface limit), but not the entire encap list. I
wrote a perl script that will convert the encap.txt into a router
config, but I wouldn't try it on anything less than a 2600 (due to
config size limitations), and a 2651xm preferably for performance
reasons. Let me know if you are interested in the script (its still
pretty rough). I'd like to see your AUX config for slip. I'm running my
tunnels as ipip instead of nos, I don't know if there is a reason to
still use nos.
Jason - KY9J
5 Nov
5 Nov
1:14 a.m.
Actually, ampr encap uses proto 4 (IPIP), proto 94 being obsolete.
73s de Marius, YO2LOJ
-----Original Message-----
From: 44net-bounces+marius=yo2loj.ro(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
[mailto:44net-bounces+marius=yo2loj.ro@hamradio.ucsd.edu] On Behalf Of Nick
G4IRX (44.131)
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 02:39
To: 44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
Subject: [44net] Encap tunnels
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
Hello,
New to the list although I do have some JNOS experiences from 12+ years ago.
FIrstly, I seem to have volunteered myself as co-ordinator for amprnets in
my part of the UK - 44.131.[56-62] so I'd like to thank my predecessor John
G1HTL for his efforts over the past couple of decades.
I'm trying to discover what the best practice is for routing 44net traffic
based upon what I can see in the encap file. Presumably each one of these is
a tunnel, what would be defined in Cisco-speak as "tunnel mode nos"
(protocol 94)?
I'm experimenting here with the G8PZT Xrouter software which runs under dos
and provides ip connectivity to radio links. I have a spare Cisco
1721 that I've connected to Xrouter with a SLIP link to the aux port on the
router and once I figure out how to get encap routing up and running I may
be able to provide 44net access via a radio port (subject to UK licensing of
course ) .
I'm interested to know what other folks are using to route 44net over the
internet?
Regards,
Nick.
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
4:32 a.m.
New subject: INP3 recent work?
howdy all, have been looking into inter-operability of INP3 with netrom
quality-based routing, and see there has been work done for older
kernels but cannot find anything recent:
http://sharon.pi8zaa.ampr.org/users/pe1rxq/inp3.html
Maiko has ported this code to jnos I believe, but I don't see any
linux-native ports of the code more recent than kernel 2.6.4...I'm
running linux mint 10 and
mint 13 in my machines, and the kernel is much newer, haven't tried the
patch yet on the newer 3.0+ kernels, anyone had any experience with this?
Cheers,
John
4213
days inactive
4213
days old
3 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Jason R Begley -
JJ -
Marius Petrescu -
Nick G4IRX (44.131)