On 7/19/22 2:16 PM, Rob PE1CHL via 44net wrote:
I hope that, rather sooner than later, we can offer a
new connectivity
option for AMPRnet that does not require tricks in your router, does not
depend on a static address, works with CGNAT, etc.
We did this here in Tampa. It works across NAT44444 (yes 5 nats), and even
across another hamwan remote.
https://wiki.w9cr.net/index.php/HamWAN_Remote_Site
If anyone wants a connection, hit me up directly. The hub is
tampa-vpn.tampa.flscg.org, give it a ping/traceroute and see if it's close to
you.
The objective is to use a modern standard VPN instead
of IPIP (wireguard,
openvpn, l2tp/ipsec or whatever) to connect to a relatively local point of
presence that will handle the further routing towards other users and the
internet for you, with good latency and reliability.
The IP mesh doesn't work well, it's got the same issues that all the SDWAN
vendors have for direct connections.
HamWAN Tampa announces our IP space, from a single point, but we could
actually install multiple head end routers and spread this out.
We need to lower the bar for making connections. Like
you, most people
want to put applications online rather than fighting with protocols that
are not easy to deploy anymore.
Well for anything less than a /24, yes. If it's a /24, do BGP.
--
Bryan Fields
727-409-1194 - Voice
http://bryanfields.net