I moved the statistics files and graphs around and added some.
https://gw.ampr.org/ still redirects you to www.ampr.org
Non-sensitive info is in https://gw.ampr.org/router/ Available without a password. This is traffic counters and graphs.
Gateway-related info is in https://gw.ampr.org/private/ A username and password are still required to access this. - Brian
Thank you for sharing
Its intresting to know that only the background noise is 15MB/s didnt think that the probing and other garbage on our network is so high
Is it possible to change the scale from 1.5 X 10^7 to 15 M ?
do i understand that traffic is about 350 kbytes /sec ? for all amprnet ? how can it be ? I have Video (web) camera on the amprnet that sends about 600 Kbytes/sec according to my router stats I dont see this traffic on the graph it pass throug the AMPR gateway because i test it from outside the amprnet network
it looks like the network is dead ... no one using it ?
What is the explain for the zero traffic from 20:00 till the end of the graph ?
________________________________
https://gw.ampr.org/ still redirects you to www.ampr.orghttp://www.ampr.org Amateur Radio Digital Communications | Managing the ...http://www.ampr.org/ www.ampr.org Looking for technical information or how to get a subnet allocation? Be sure to visit our WIKI, and interact with us on the Portal. You may join our discussion ...
Non-sensitive info is in https://gw.ampr.org/router/ Available without a password. This is traffic counters and graphs.
Gateway-related info is in https://gw.ampr.org/private/ A username and password are still required to access this. - Brian
_________________________________________ 44Net mailing list 44Net@hamradio.ucsd.edu http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
it looks like the network is dead ... no one using it ?
The graph only shows what comes through the gateway. doesn't account for amprnet-to-amprnet traffic. And plenty of folks have external connections go direct through their external address, rather than the gateway.
Michael N6MEF
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 04:48:58AM +0000, R P wrote:
Is it possible to change the scale from 1.5 X 10^7 to 15 M ?
I don't know how to do that. I'm using mostly the automatic defaults in gnuplot and I'm still learning it.
do i understand that traffic is about 350 kbytes /sec ? for all amprnet ? how can it be ? I have Video (web) camera on the amprnet that sends about 600 Kbytes/sec according to my router stats I dont see this traffic on the graph it pass throug the AMPR gateway because i test it from outside the amprnet network
Right now the outbound traffic seems to be about 90 kbyte/sec. It's pretty low.
it looks like the network is dead ... no one using it ?
That's what I'm coming to believe.
What is the explain for the zero traffic from 20:00 till the end of the graph ?
It's not zero, but it's pretty low. Between 12:00 and 12:15 local time today there was a huge drop in incoming encapsulated traffic. It's still low. I don't know what the cause is. I'll see what I can find out. - Brian
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 10:19:47PM -0700, Brian Kantor wrote:
What is the explain for the zero traffic from 20:00 till the end of the graph ?
It's not zero, but it's pretty low. Between 12:00 and 12:15 local time today there was a huge drop in incoming encapsulated traffic. It's still low. I don't know what the cause is. I'll see what I can find out.
- Brian
This is rather disturbing. Many of the gateways in the gateway statistics are showing ZERO encap packets coming from them. One of the busiest normally is the gateway for Germany, 141.75.245.225, which has not sent ANY encap packets to amprgw since the current stats began, 3 hours ago. Normally it would have sent thousands. However, it's up and pingable on its Internet address. And tcpdump shows no incoming traffic from it except the response to my pings.
And there are many others, all over the world, which seem to have stopped sending encap.
Yet some gateways are working fine - I can ping or connect to the tunnel-connected AMPRNet hosts I tested with. And there is some inbound encap traffic, but 99% of it is gone.
I don't know what's going on. I'm trying to find out. - Brian
All,
If it helps understanding the low traffic, personally I lost commercial Internet between 01:10 UTC and 03:10 UTC.
Also, I saw something rather strange while my Internet was "out"
2017-05-16 21:32:23.893 0.529 ICMP 44.60.44.1:0 -> 71.163.244.1:3.0 2 696 1
I'm not quite sure why (and how) my new Verizon gateway sent an IPENCAP packet to my tunl0 interface, while I was offline, prior to obtaining a WAN IP...and elicited a response...even though it should have failed, they could have captured these packets encaped and bound for AMPRGW.
All I can tell is:
- the inner and outer source IP addresses could not have been a bogon (unless ampr-ripd bypasses the RAW iptables as well) and did not equal 44.60.44.0/24 - the destination inner address must have been some IP for which I have a local route - but NOT on table 44; and does not equal 44.60.44.0/24 - my Kernel appears to be leaking information that an IP exists locally - my best guess is they attempted to reach the outside IP of their downstream router via the tunnel, and no route exists
I believe this behavior should have failed with kmod-ipip, as I have a firewall rule in place to accept IPENCAP only from your valid GW IPs. As most may now know, I bring-my-own-device on my Verizon FiOS because I observed the IPENCAP forward rule removed multiple times without my intervention. Their router is downstream only to allow MOCA bridging (and to connect as the gateway when I have a service ticket, as they will only troubleshoot with it).
- Lynwood KB3VWG
Is it possible to have a link from the main page to this router statistic page in order that we will not have to remember the correct path ?
________________________________
Non-sensitive info is in https://gw.ampr.org/router/ Available without a password. This is traffic counters and graphs.
-
Brian Kantor -
lleachii＠aol.com -
Michael Fox - N6MEF -
R P