-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 24/07/2013 19:02, Neil Johnson wrote:
I'm a network engineer at another University in
the midwest US and
I *might* be able to convince our routing guru to let us be a BGP
peer and I could setup another tunnel end point box.
Great one more OM on board.
I would need explicit details on how this would work
and a the
potential risks and plans for their mitigation before I approach
him.
Very valid point. Out of the box I can think of a few risks (bandwidth
usage, # of routes announced, BGP flapping, routing loops,
unauthorized announcements, etc) that we need to discuss. This is also
one of the reasons I proposed this as a trial using for example
44.128.0.0/16 and not the whole 44.0.0.0/8.
We don't have earthquakes, just tornados and
floods :-)
That's another part of the risk analysis but also a reason why
multiple gateways might be a good idea.
73 de Marc, LX1DUC
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools -
http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://www.enigmail.net/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=C9XQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----