On Fri, 6 Sep 2013, Rob Janssen wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
Subject:
Re: [44net] amprnet routing made simple
From:
K7VE - John <k7ve(a)k7ve.org>
Date:
09/06/2013 06:58 PM
To:
n1uro(a)n1uro.ampr.org, AMPRNet working group <44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu>
This may be a stop gap for low traffic sites, but I think the goal is to
avoid sending everything through 44.0.0.1.
This solution is not sending
"everything through 44.0.0.1"
Only traffic incoming from non-44 internet addresses to your net-44 station
is replied via that path.
All other traffic is going via direct tunnels.
We should be working toward deprecating hacked
solutions, like the IPIP
tunnel set.
I don't agree with that.
People who want to experiment with BGP are free and welcome to do that, but
there is no and
there should not be any "deprecating IPIP tunnels".
+10
--- Jay WB8TKL
() ascii ribbon campaign in
/\ support of plain text e-mail
Averaging at least 3 days of MTBWTF!?!?!?
The solution for long term Internet growth is IPv6.
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Jay Nugent jjn(a)nuge.com (734)484-5105 (734)649-0850/Cell |
| Nugent Telecommunications [
www.nuge.com] |
| Internet Consulting/Linux SysAdmin/Engineering & Design |
| ISP Monitoring [
www.ispmonitor.org] ISP & Modem Performance Monitoring |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
18:01:01 up 6 days, 5:26, 2 users, load average: 0.31, 0.29, 0.26