-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
You may want to look at:
http://modwhois.sourceforge.net/
mod_whois enables Apache (version 2) to receive standard WHOIS
queries, and rewrites them to standard HTTP requests. The request can
then be processed by the usual means (static content, CGI's, PHP,
tomcat, whatever).
We could be providing more specific information then what's possible
via ARIN.
Especially if an IP is not part of a BGP "sub-announcement" and has
not reverse DNS, we could just return that this IP is NOT connected to
the Internet, however when queried from within AMPR/44net, we could
return more information. The internet really doesn't need to know
about unconnected addresses.
Also we don't collect addresses and phone numbers etc, we register IP
addresses mainly to callsigns. At the end some privacy should be
guaranteed to the outside, we may still provide more information if
queried from within AMPR/44net.
73 de Marc, LX1DUC
On 26/11/2013 23:41, Bryan Fields wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________ On 11/26/13 5:28
PM, Brian Kantor wrote:
Not really. We probably should. I'm a little
unclear on exactly
what would be required and how much it's going to cost. - Brian
I'm happy
to help out, as it's quite easy to fill out the SWIP
forms and then submit it. We could setup rwhois for the 44/net
space, but that might be a bit much for us as the portal is not
always available.
ARIN should not charge a fee to administrator resources for legacy
users:
10. I have legacy resources registered in ARIN's Whois database
but have no plans to sign the LRSA. Will ARIN continue to maintain
my records, and can I still make database changes to my records if
I need to?
ARIN will continue to process requests from the authorized points
of contact of legacy resources for updates to their registration
records. Currently, there is no community driven policy
specifically prohibiting ARIN from processing updates to records
that are not covered under a LRSA or RSA, although that could
change in the future.
info on swip is here
https://www.arin.net/resources/request/reassignments.html
Basically you could swip the regional blocks to the regional
admins, and when they assign them they swip the assigned blocks to
end users. This would fix the in-addr.arpa mapping too, which as
of now does not exist for anything on AMPRNET.
Thoughts?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools -
http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://www.enigmail.net/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=NGsG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----