3 May
2017
3 May
'17
6:39 a.m.
Hi there
Long ago the AMPRNET was defined that both IP PID 94 and 4 was working ?
What is situation today ? will it work with PID94 ?
if possible may someone explain why we moved to PID4 ? as at this period I wasnt active
with the AMPRNet
Thanks for any info
Ronen - 4Z4ZQ
http://www.ronen.org
2) Why there is no option to add attachment (or graphics ) to the list ? is it because
of Disk space ? etc ?
from time to time it is usefull to have a screen capture of log of network related
issues
Ronen Pinchooks (4Z4ZQ) WebSite<http://www.ronen.org/>
www.ronen.org
ronen.org (Ronen Pinchooks (4Z4ZQ) WebSite) is hosted by domainavenue.com
3 May
3 May
6:50 a.m.
1. UDPIP (UDP encapsulation to port 94) isn't implemented in the router
nor the portal. I don't know about other software. It might be useful where
ISPs are blocking IPIP encapsulated packets. It has few other advantages.
2. The list has over 500 subscribers. I feel that filling up 500
people's mailboxes with something that only one or two people are going
to look at is bad manners. List postings are limited to 32k bytes to keep
messages short. 32k is a lot of text. You can always mail directly to
the person who wants to see your screen capture or log entries.
- Brian
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 10:39:37AM +0000, R P wrote:
Long ago the AMPRNET was defined that both IP PID 94
and 4 was working ?
What is situation today ? will it work with PID94 ?
if possible may someone explain why we moved to PID4 ? as at this period I wasnt
active with the AMPRNet
2) Why there is no option to add attachment (or graphics ) to the list ? is it because
of Disk space ? etc ?
from time to time it is usefull to have a screen capture of log of network related
issues
11:16 a.m.
Additionally, one can use a picture upload service or pastebin for
anything public and bigger than this.
2759
days inactive
2759
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Brian Kantor -
Kathie Dart -
R P