Hi Brian..
BPQ of any of the three present flavors is much more than a node front end..
BPQ has come a long way over the last several years with all kinds of
features. Advancements coming at warp speed.
I still need to get with u and turn my jnos box into a uronode. :)
-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Rogers [mailto:n1uro@n1uro.ampr.org]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 8:00 PM
To: n9lya(a)blueriver.net; AMPRNet working group
Subject: Re: [44net] IP Gateway
On Thu, 2013-09-12 at 15:48 -0400, Jerry spake:
in regards to LinBPQ,
Do you have an allocation in the 44 network? I'm
thinking of trying to
add the amprnet tunnelling code to LinBPQ.
73, John
This suggests that BPQ for linux contains it's own protocol stack, which for
a simple node front-end should not be necessary. I may be wrong but if this
is not true, than the protocols should be read from the system and routing
via ipencap should already be there.
--
73 de Brian Rogers - N1URO
email: <n1uro(a)n1uro.ampr.org>
Web:
http://www.n1uro.net/
Ampr1:
http://n1uro.ampr.org/
Ampr2:
http://nos.n1uro.ampr.org
Linux Amateur Radio Services
axMail-Fax & URONode
AmprNet coordinator for:
Connecticut, Delaware, Maine,
Massachusetts, New Hampshire,
Pennsylvania, Rhode Island,
and Vermont.