13 Jun
2017
13 Jun
'17
10:27 p.m.
Ok, they're gone too. What about
pe5hwg IN A 62.108.10.22
which appears to be an anomoly, being outside net 44.
Hmm that is a strange one!
I don't think I added that, and pe5hwg is not a valid callsign.
The IP address is in the Netherlands, though.
Maybe you can still trace who submitted that?
Rob
13 Jun
13 Jun
10:30 p.m.
New subject: DNS Cleanup
No, it was submitted to the DNS robot prior to 2011, so I have
no record of who sent it in. We've only been keeping 'whodunnit'
information since late 2011.
If it's not a valid callsign I'm going to delete it.
- Brian
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 12:27:04AM +0200, Rob Janssen wrote:
Ok, they're
gone too. What about
pe5hwg IN A 62.108.10.22
which appears to be an anomoly, being outside net 44.
Hmm that is a strange one!
I don't think I added that, and pe5hwg is not a valid callsign.
The IP address is in the Netherlands, though.
Maybe you can still trace who submitted that?
Rob
2726
days inactive
2726
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Brian Kantor -
Rob Janssen