Has anyone else see connectivity problems of the 44 net ?
My tunnel work but no connection to the internet
Regards
Ronen - 4Z4ZQ
I'm not receiving RIP packets from the gateway, and haven't had internet connectivity for over 48 hours now. Glad to hear it's not just me, I've been pulling my hair out looking for a problem with my end ;)
Josh - VK2HFF
On 9/06/2017 4:54 PM, R P wrote:
Has anyone else see connectivity problems of the 44 net ?
My tunnel work but no connection to the internet
And have you changed the IP address of the UCSD Tunnel?
SP2GCH
2017-06-09 9:47 GMT+02:00 Josh josh@festy.org:
I'm not receiving RIP packets from the gateway, and haven't had internet connectivity for over 48 hours now. Glad to hear it's not just me, I've been pulling my hair out looking for a problem with my end ;)
Josh - VK2HFF
On 9/06/2017 4:54 PM, R P wrote:
Has anyone else see connectivity problems of the 44 net ?
My tunnel work but no connection to the internet
44Net mailing list 44Net@hamradio.ucsd.edu http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
Yes, added the new gateway around May 27 from memory but should still be accepting traffic from both. I've been watching a tcpdump of my interface all day and there's been no RIP traffic at all. After manually grabbing a copy of encap.txt I can reach other gateways, just not amprgw.
On 9/06/2017 5:49 PM, Jacek Grzona wrote:
And have you changed the IP address of the UCSD Tunnel?
Josh, your problem appears to be similar to Ronen's. The ipip gateway is working normally, the routes to you appear to be correct, and I can ping your gateway on its commercial address. You should be receiving encapsulated RIP packets every five minutes from 169.228.34.84. Please check that that address is allowed through any firewalls you may have and that you have it configured as the endpoint of your tunnel to the internet. - Brian
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 05:47:07PM +1000, Josh wrote:
I'm not receiving RIP packets from the gateway, and haven't had internet connectivity for over 48 hours now. Glad to hear it's not just me, I've been pulling my hair out looking for a problem with my end ;)
Josh - VK2HFF
Ronen, I have checked the ipip gateway here and it is functioning normally. I can connect to the various test hosts on the 44 net as usual. Further, I can ping your gateway on its 5.29.18.144 address, so things should be working unless the problem is at your end. - Brian
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 06:54:16AM +0000, R P wrote:
Has anyone else see connectivity problems of the 44 net ? My tunnel work but no connection to the internet Regards Ronen - 4Z4ZQ
i think it is something in the routing table in the main router as happened a week ago until u made reset or so ________________________________ From: 44Net 44net-bounces+ronenp=hotmail.com@hamradio.ucsd.edu on behalf of Brian Kantor Brian@UCSD.Edu Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 2:45:35 AM To: AMPRNet working group Subject: Re: [44net] 44 net connectivity problems ?
Ronen, I have checked the ipip gateway here and it is functioning normally. I can connect to the various test hosts on the 44 net as usual. Further, I can ping your gateway on its 5.29.18.144 address, so things should be working unless the problem is at your end. - Brian
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 06:54:16AM +0000, R P wrote:
Has anyone else see connectivity problems of the 44 net ? My tunnel work but no connection to the internet Regards Ronen - 4Z4ZQ
_________________________________________ 44Net mailing list 44Net@hamradio.ucsd.edu http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
Ok, I have restarted the ipip router. Please see if this fixed your problem? I may still have a bug that needs to fixed. - Brian
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 10:46:12AM +0000, R P wrote:
i think it is something in the routing table in the main router as happened a week ago until u made reset or so
im out of home and with the smartphone its hard to me to debug but after thre reset stil no conectivity i have cheked via ping.eu and the ttace stop at amprgate is there someone else here that use tunnel not bgp and have also problem from 44 net to go to the outer world ? ________________________________ From: 44Net 44net-bounces+ronenp=hotmail.com@hamradio.ucsd.edu on behalf of R P ronenp@hotmail.com Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 3:46:12 AM To: AMPRNet working group Subject: Re: [44net] 44 net connectivity problems ?
i think it is something in the routing table in the main router as happened a week ago until u made reset or so ________________________________ From: 44Net 44net-bounces+ronenp=hotmail.com@hamradio.ucsd.edu on behalf of Brian Kantor Brian@UCSD.Edu Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 2:45:35 AM To: AMPRNet working group Subject: Re: [44net] 44 net connectivity problems ?
Ronen, I have checked the ipip gateway here and it is functioning normally. I can connect to the various test hosts on the 44 net as usual. Further, I can ping your gateway on its 5.29.18.144 address, so things should be working unless the problem is at your end. - Brian
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 06:54:16AM +0000, R P wrote:
Has anyone else see connectivity problems of the 44 net ? My tunnel work but no connection to the internet Regards Ronen - 4Z4ZQ
_________________________________________ 44Net mailing list 44Net@hamradio.ucsd.edu http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
After weeks of working with mine while things were changing I can confirm the AMPR-GW is working as I can get to a machine in my allocation from the public Internet. Do you firewall anything that might need to be changed in your scripts to account for the new AMPR-GW? Lynwood turned me on to an adaptive script that only allows IPIP traffic from other gateways to include receipt of the RIP44 broadcast. If you have it locked down you might be firewalling yourself off of the AMPRNet...
Tom Cardinal/N2XU/MSgt USAF (Ret)/BSCS/CASP, Security+ ce
On 6/9/2017 06:05, R P wrote:
im out of home and with the smartphone its hard to me to debug but after thre reset stil no conectivity i have cheked via ping.eu and the ttace stop at amprgate is there someone else here that use tunnel not bgp and have also problem from 44 net to go to the outer world ? ________________________________ From: 44Net 44net-bounces+ronenp=hotmail.com@hamradio.ucsd.edu on behalf of R P ronenp@hotmail.com Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 3:46:12 AM To: AMPRNet working group Subject: Re: [44net] 44 net connectivity problems ?
i think it is something in the routing table in the main router as happened a week ago until u made reset or so
From: 44Net 44net-bounces+ronenp=hotmail.com@hamradio.ucsd.edu on behalf of Brian Kantor Brian@UCSD.Edu Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 2:45:35 AM To: AMPRNet working group Subject: Re: [44net] 44 net connectivity problems ?
Ronen, I have checked the ipip gateway here and it is functioning normally. I can connect to the various test hosts on the 44 net as usual. Further, I can ping your gateway on its 5.29.18.144 address, so things should be working unless the problem is at your end. - Brian
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 06:54:16AM +0000, R P wrote:
Has anyone else see connectivity problems of the 44 net ? My tunnel work but no connection to the internet Regards Ronen - 4Z4ZQ
44Net mailing list 44Net@hamradio.ucsd.edu http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
I have returned home after i accidentally disabled the tunnel interface while trying to recover things using the smartphone
I have turned on the Tunnel interface and all seems to work OK
Mystery ....
Ronen - 4Z4ZQ
________________________________ From: 44Net 44net-bounces+ronenp=hotmail.com@hamradio.ucsd.edu on behalf of Brian Kantor Brian@UCSD.Edu Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 2:45 AM To: AMPRNet working group Subject: Re: [44net] 44 net connectivity problems ?
Ronen, I have checked the ipip gateway here and it is functioning normally. I can connect to the various test hosts on the 44 net as usual. Further, I can ping your gateway on its 5.29.18.144 address, so things should be working unless the problem is at your end. - Brian
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 06:54:16AM +0000, R P wrote:
Has anyone else see connectivity problems of the 44 net ? My tunnel work but no connection to the internet Regards Ronen - 4Z4ZQ
_________________________________________ 44Net mailing list 44Net@hamradio.ucsd.edu http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
Josh and Ronen,
Do you happen to have dynamic IPs assigned from your ISP?
Have they changed recently?
73,
- Lynwood KB3VWG
I'm on a static IP, I did change service providers a few weeks back but everything was working fine on the new IP up until a few days ago. I've just grabbed a 10 minute log of all ipip packets in/out of my DMZ interface and all packets on my tunnel for roughly the same time period, they're at http://44.136.24.62/tcpdump/ if anyone is interested (but currently only accessible from another 44 tunnel). There's traffic there, just nothing from amprgw so it appears that the other tunnels I've tested with must have correct encap entries for my network. I've double-checked the portal and my gateway IP is correct there too.
I think my next step is to contact my service provider, it is possible that they saw "suspicious" ipip traffic coming from amprgw to me so blocked it.
Josh - VK2HFF
On 10/06/2017 12:42 PM, lleachii--- via 44Net wrote:
Josh and Ronen,
Do you happen to have dynamic IPs assigned from your ISP?
Have they changed recently?
Greetings.
portal.ampr.org seem to be offline for couple of hours...
No way to login, no way to download encap.txt file.
Best regards.
It’s back online now - more DDOS unfortunately
Chris
On 11 Jun 2017, at 08:11, SP2L@wp.pl wrote:
Greetings.
portal.ampr.org seem to be offline for couple of hours...
No way to login, no way to download encap.txt file.
Best regards.
-- Tom - SP2L
It is nice to be important. But it is more important to be nice!
Chris.
I thought so... To bad...
Best regards.
On 10/06/2017 4:28 PM, Josh wrote:
I think my next step is to contact my service provider, it is possible that they saw "suspicious" ipip traffic coming from amprgw to me so blocked it.
I've now confirmed with my service provider that they are not blocking traffic either to or from amprgw. About 12 hours ago I started logging inbound ipip connections on my wan interface, but so far have seen nothing from 169.228.34.84.
# Pkts Traffic Action Prot Fl In Out Source Dest Options 6 0 0.00 B ACCEPT 4 -- * * 169.228.34.84 0.0.0.0/0 - 7 0 0.00 B ACCEPT 4 -- * * 169.228.66.251 0.0.0.0/0 - 8 7652 9.94 MB LOG 4 -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 LOG flags 0 level 4 prefix "(IPIP)"
I've run out of things to try, and am pretty well convinced that the ipip packets from amprgw are not getting to my WAN interface. I can ping amprgw, and a traceroute makes it as far as rci-nodem-p2p.ucsd.edu (which I think is amprgw's gateway?) so there are no obvious routing issues. I added a rule at the top of my input table an hour ago to log all inbound connections from amprgw, and so far the only matches have been the 4 ICMP replies from my ping test. Any thoughts on where the problem might be?
Josh - VK2HFF
Josh;
On Fri, 2017-06-16 at 10:40 +1000, Josh wrote:
I've now confirmed with my service provider that they are not blocking traffic either to or from amprgw. About 12 hours ago I started logging inbound ipip connections on my wan interface, but so far have seen nothing from 169.228.34.84.
You may want to read my white page about being bitten by the dog. ISPs will *never* grant you the integrity of admitting to what they're doing as they feel it's not a customer's business what the ISP does on the ISPs network.
This is slowly becoming an epidemic globally with ISPs deploying CPEs with faulty firmware... deliberately. There are alternatives and tests to see if you are bitten. Considering you're having issues you may not be able to see the document but it's at: https://n1uro.ampr.org/linuxconf/amprcable.html
-------- 73 de Brian - N1URO/AFT1BR email: (see above) Web: http://www.n1uro.net/ Ampr1: http://n1uro.ampr.org/ Ampr2: http://nos.n1uro.ampr.org Linux Amateur Radio Services axMail-Fax & URONode http://uronode.sourceforge.net http://axmail.sourceforge.net AmprNet coordinator for: Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont.
Josh,
I'm more than happy to see if you are sending IPENCAP (IP Protocol No. 4)...but you're not receiving...
Let's first make sure:
- Who is your ISP? - Let's make sure you're receiving IPENCAAP (IP Protocol No. 4) - What's the make and model of router? - how are your configuring your device to receive IPENCAP and processes them?
If you WERE receiving them and they disappeared, did you (or your ISP) make any known changes?
- Lynwood KB3VWG
You may want to read my white page about being bitten by the dog.
Hi Lynwood,
My ISP (or RSP as they're known here now) is a company called TPG. They're one of the largest in the country. I am both sending and receiving ipencap just fine from what I can see, here's a capture of a ping through my gateway to 44.88.0.9: 12:00:18.839944 IP 192.168.1.2 > 24.34.225.54: IP 44.136.24.2 > 44.88.0.9: ICMP echo request, id 9, seq 0, length 80 (ipip-proto-4) 12:00:19.130214 IP 24.34.225.54 > 192.168.1.2: IP 44.88.0.9 > 44.136.24.2: ICMP echo reply, id 9, seq 0, length 80 (ipip-proto-4) 12:00:19.161423 IP 192.168.1.2 > 24.34.225.54: IP 44.136.24.2 > 44.88.0.9: ICMP echo request, id 9, seq 1, length 80 (ipip-proto-4) 12:00:19.451597 IP 24.34.225.54 > 192.168.1.2: IP 44.88.0.9 > 44.136.24.2: ICMP echo reply, id 9, seq 1, length 80 (ipip-proto-4)
My vdsl modem is a Huawei HG659b. The modem routes all DMZ traffic to an interface on a Broadcom based AP running OpenWRT via a cisco WS-C3750g-24PS. I can see all manner of connections hitting my DMZ interface from my public IP (typical portscans etc) so the modem->DMZ forwarding seems ok. My gateway has an address from my 44 subnet on its tunnel interface, and another on an ethernet port that connects to my switch's vlan 44. I can connect to and from other tunnels from my gateway, my switch's vlan44 interface and from other devices connected to vlan 44.
Josh - VK2HFF
On 16/06/2017 11:30 AM, lleachii--- via 44Net wrote:
Josh,
I'm more than happy to see if you are sending IPENCAP (IP Protocol No. 4)...but you're not receiving...
Let's first make sure:
- Who is your ISP?
- Let's make sure you're receiving IPENCAAP (IP Protocol No. 4)
- What's the make and model of router?
- how are your configuring your device to receive IPENCAP and
processes them?
If you WERE receiving them and they disappeared, did you (or your ISP) make any known changes?
- Lynwood
KB3VWG
You may want to read my white page about being bitten by the dog.
44Net mailing list 44Net@hamradio.ucsd.edu http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
Thanks Brian. I have no trouble getting to other 44 gateways via my tunnel including yours (after loading routes from encap.txt via ampr-ripd) so it's not a case of protocol 4 being blocked by my vdsl modem. Since last night I've logged over 10,000 ipip connections on my gateway - just nothing from amprgw.
I was expecting to get a form letter response from my service provider's helpdesk when I asked, but to my surprise it was escalated to their network engineering team who appear to have actually investigated before responding.
Testing from http://kb3vwg-010.ampr.org/tools/trace/php-trace44.php shows that my tunnel is reachable:
traceroute to 44.136.24.60 (44.136.24.60), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 kb3vwg-001.ampr.org (44.60.44.1) 0.999 ms 1.021 ms 1.148 ms 2 vk2hff.ampr.org (44.136.24.60) 525.972 ms 548.696 ms 572.350 ms
Also from http://yo2tm.ampr.org/nettools.php:
traceroute to 44.136.24.60 (44.136.24.60), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 router.yo2loj.ampr.org (44.182.21.254) 0.279 ms 2 net.vk2hff.ampr.org (44.136.24.60) 687.700 ms
I've tried connecting to a random selection of the gateways that had recently checked in to yo2tm's map and no issues there either.
Josh - VK2HFF
On 16/06/2017 11:25 AM, Brian wrote:
Josh;
On Fri, 2017-06-16 at 10:40 +1000, Josh wrote:
I've now confirmed with my service provider that they are not blocking traffic either to or from amprgw. About 12 hours ago I started logging inbound ipip connections on my wan interface, but so far have seen nothing from 169.228.34.84.
You may want to read my white page about being bitten by the dog. ISPs will *never* grant you the integrity of admitting to what they're doing as they feel it's not a customer's business what the ISP does on the ISPs network.
This is slowly becoming an epidemic globally with ISPs deploying CPEs with faulty firmware... deliberately. There are alternatives and tests to see if you are bitten. Considering you're having issues you may not be able to see the document but it's at: https://n1uro.ampr.org/linuxconf/amprcable.html
73 de Brian - N1URO/AFT1BR email: (see above) Web: http://www.n1uro.net/ Ampr1: http://n1uro.ampr.org/ Ampr2: http://nos.n1uro.ampr.org Linux Amateur Radio Services axMail-Fax & URONode http://uronode.sourceforge.net http://axmail.sourceforge.net AmprNet coordinator for: Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont.
I've run tcpdump on amprgw and can confirm that IPIP packets are being sent to you, including the RIP transmissions every 5 minutes.
I can ping your gateway on 110.175.89.41 from 169.228.34.84. If you are recording inbound traffic from it, you should see the pings from a few minutes ago. - Brian
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 10:40:20AM +1000, Josh wrote:
I've now confirmed with my service provider that they are not blocking traffic either to or from amprgw. About 12 hours ago I started logging inbound ipip connections on my wan interface, but so far have seen nothing from 169.228.34.84.
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 10:40:20AM +1000, Josh wrote:
I've now confirmed with my service provider that they are not blocking traffic either to or from amprgw. About 12 hours ago I started logging inbound ipip connections on my wan interface, but so far have seen nothing from 169.228.34.84.
This may be of interest:
# traceroute -n -P 4 110.175.89.41 traceroute to 110.175.89.41 (110.175.89.41), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 169.228.34.82 0.268 ms 0.206 ms 0.208 ms 2 132.239.254.178 0.255 ms 0.222 ms 0.238 ms 3 132.239.254.162 0.274 ms 0.241 ms 0.238 ms 4 132.239.254.149 0.291 ms 0.291 ms 0.306 ms 5 137.164.23.57 3.034 ms 2.987 ms 2.963 ms 6 137.164.11.2 5.529 ms 5.415 ms 5.394 ms 7 * 4.35.156.65 5.372 ms 5.311 ms 8 * * * 9 4.68.62.106 5.265 ms 5.388 ms 5.221 ms 10 63.243.205.65 14.564 ms 13.385 ms 13.322 ms 11 63.243.205.2 13.394 ms 13.246 ms 13.925 ms 12 64.86.21.150 215.916 ms 215.933 ms 216.003 ms 13 203.29.134.2 217.874 ms 216.001 ms 215.935 ms 14 203.219.107.86 223.699 ms 223.964 ms 224.025 ms 15 203.219.35.202 190.371 ms 190.465 ms 190.584 ms 16 * * * 17 * * *
--- vs ---
# traceroute -n 110.175.89.41 traceroute to 110.175.89.41 (110.175.89.41), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 169.228.34.82 0.375 ms 1.037 ms 0.273 ms 2 132.239.254.178 0.249 ms 0.246 ms 0.230 ms 3 132.239.254.162 0.325 ms 0.243 ms 0.255 ms 4 132.239.254.149 0.313 ms 0.310 ms 0.294 ms 5 137.164.23.57 3.005 ms 2.902 ms 2.934 ms 6 137.164.11.2 5.531 ms 5.553 ms 5.429 ms 7 4.35.156.65 5.365 ms 5.368 ms 5.364 ms 8 * * * 9 4.68.62.106 5.318 ms 5.373 ms 5.559 ms 10 63.243.205.65 13.297 ms 13.341 ms 14.143 ms 11 63.243.205.2 13.390 ms 13.346 ms 13.149 ms 12 64.86.21.150 214.013 ms 215.975 ms 216.021 ms 13 203.29.134.2 215.013 ms 215.982 ms 215.926 ms 14 203.219.107.86 221.514 ms 223.975 ms 223.946 ms 15 203.219.35.202 190.589 ms 190.382 ms 190.583 ms 16 * * * 17 110.175.89.41 211.795 ms 211.134 ms 213.325 ms
The first traceroute is done using protocol 4 (IPIP) packets, the second using UDP. Note that the IPIP packets are not getting to hop 17.
Hop 16 doesn't respond to traceroute probes, no matter what protocol I use. I have no way of telling whether it is dropping IPIP or not.
The problem seems to be within a couple of hops to your end of things. - Brian
Thanks for testing that Brian, I can see your incoming connections:
Jun 16 11:52:27 SRC=169.228.34.84 DST=192.168.1.2 LEN=84 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=48 ID=60541 PROTO=ICMP TYPE=8 CODE=0 Jun 16 11:52:28 SRC=169.228.34.84 DST=192.168.1.2 LEN=84 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=48 ID=60826 PROTO=ICMP TYPE=8 CODE=0 Jun 16 12:04:58 SRC=169.228.34.84 DST=192.168.1.2 LEN=40 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=1 ID=44885 PROTO=UDP SPT=44836 DPT=33483 Jun 16 12:04:59 SRC=169.228.34.84 DST=192.168.1.2 LEN=40 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=1 ID=44886 PROTO=UDP SPT=44836 DPT=33484 Jun 16 12:04:59 SRC=169.228.34.84 DST=192.168.1.2 LEN=40 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=1 ID=44887 PROTO=UDP SPT=44836 DPT=33485 Jun 16 12:13:57 SRC=169.228.34.84 DST=192.168.1.2 LEN=40 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=1 ID=45011 PROTO=UDP SPT=44962 DPT=33483 Jun 16 12:13:57 SRC=169.228.34.84 DST=192.168.1.2 LEN=40 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=1 ID=45012 PROTO=UDP SPT=44962 DPT=33484 Jun 16 12:13:57 SRC=169.228.34.84 DST=192.168.1.2 LEN=40 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=1 ID=45013 PROTO=UDP SPT=44962 DPT=33485 Jun 16 12:24:59 SRC=169.228.34.84 DST=192.168.1.2 LEN=48 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=1 ID=45163 PROTO=ICMP TYPE=8 CODE=0 Jun 16 12:24:59 SRC=169.228.34.84 DST=192.168.1.2 LEN=48 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=1 ID=45164 PROTO=ICMP TYPE=8 CODE=0 Jun 16 12:24:59 SRC=169.228.34.84 DST=192.168.1.2 LEN=48 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=1 ID=45165 PROTO=ICMP TYPE=8 CODE=0
On 16/06/2017 12:00 PM, Brian Kantor wrote:
I've run tcpdump on amprgw and can confirm that IPIP packets are being sent to you, including the RIP transmissions every 5 minutes.
I can ping your gateway on 110.175.89.41 from 169.228.34.84. If you are recording inbound traffic from it, you should see the pings from a few minutes ago.
- Brian
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 10:40:20AM +1000, Josh wrote:
I've now confirmed with my service provider that they are not blocking traffic either to or from amprgw. About 12 hours ago I started logging inbound ipip connections on my wan interface, but so far have seen nothing from 169.228.34.84.
44Net mailing list 44Net@hamradio.ucsd.edu http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
I get dynamic IP from the ISP
I use no-ip.org service to make name for it and this name apear in the Portal so far so good all works fine for about a year
Lucky me that the IP dont change for weeks / month es so even if it change it takes about an hour of no connectivity until all the system of the portal and amprgate sync to the new address
in my last case i have found the root cause
it is a bug (probably) in the mikrotik
I had two Tunnels defined during the change of the address of the AMPRGATE one pointing for the old address to get the inbound traffic and one pointing to the new address to route the outbound traffic
when the change has done i have changed the old Tunnel IP to point to the new address and disabled the new tunnel interface (didnt delete it only disabled it)
and when the router rebooted (i had Powerfail at home) for some strange reason it get mixed by two interfaces have same IP address as destination and didnt work
solution i have changed the disabled tunnel destination ip to something else and now after reboot all works ok
ill keep this setup for a while and then erase the disabled tunnel for good
Ronen - 4Z4ZQ
________________________________ From: 44Net 44net-bounces+ronenp=hotmail.com@hamradio.ucsd.edu on behalf of lleachii--- via 44Net 44net@hamradio.ucsd.edu Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 7:42 PM To: 44net@hamradio.ucsd.edu Cc: lleachii@aol.com Subject: Re: [44net] 44 net connectivity problems ?
Josh and Ronen,
Do you happen to have dynamic IPs assigned from your ISP?
Have they changed recently?
73,
- Lynwood KB3VWG
_________________________________________ 44Net mailing list 44Net@hamradio.ucsd.edu http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net