20 Dec
2013
20 Dec
'13
1:01 p.m.
Hello all,
I don't like the idea of regulatory discussions on this list.
However, I am curious (as it's pertinent to what we do on this list)
what the rules are in other counties for ham radio.. So far I haven't
had much luck finding the answers on the web.
Presently in US ham radio data bandwith:
2 meters is 20 khz max, 19.6 kilobauds
70 cm is 100 khz max, 56 kilobauds
Ironically, while there is plenty of space on 70 cm, other modes like
ATV are permitted to occupy up to 6 MHz of bandwidth.
Since we have a nice mix of hams from all over the world on this list,
I'd appreciated a reply (can be off list) on what is permitted in your
country on 2 meters and 70 cm.
Thanks,
Steve, KB9MWR
20 Dec
20 Dec
1:14 p.m.
On 20-12-13 19:01, kb9mwr(a)gmail.com wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
Hello all,
I don't like the idea of regulatory discussions on this list.
However, I am curious (as it's pertinent to what we do on this list)
what the rules are in other counties for ham radio.. So far I haven't
had much luck finding the answers on the web.
Presently in US ham radio data bandwith:
2 meters is 20 khz max, 19.6 kilobauds
70 cm is 100 khz max, 56 kilobauds
Ironically, while there is plenty of space on 70 cm, other modes like
ATV are permitted to occupy up to 6 MHz of bandwidth.
Since we have a nice mix of hams from all over the world on this list,
I'd appreciated a reply (can be off list) on what is permitted in your
country on 2 meters and 70 cm.
Thanks,
Steve, KB9MWR
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
In the Netherlands, if it fits in the bandlimits you can legaly use it
regardless of mode, band or speeds.
Offcourse you have to wonder if it is smart to use a small band like 2
meter (2 MHz wide) with very wide modes.
73 Andre PE1RDW
1:52 p.m.
A question...is it really limited in bandwidth to 19.6K on 2m and 56K on
440 or is it just that this is the maximum used by the modes in common use?
While at Data Radio (now calamp) we had 56K on a standard 20KHz channel
for Police/Fire and Utilities. Their Viper Radio claims 32kbps on a
12.5khz channel. (as you know there are no more 20khz freq for commercial)
Lin
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 1:14 PM, PE1RDW <pe1rdw(a)amsat.org> wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
On 20-12-13 19:01, kb9mwr(a)gmail.com wrote:
--
Lin Holcomb
Office: +1 404 806 5412
Mobile: +1 404 933 1595
Fax: +1 404 348 4250
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
Hello all,
I don't like the idea of regulatory discussions on this list.
However, I am curious (as it's pertinent to what we do on this list)
what the rules are in other counties for ham radio.. So far I haven't
had much luck finding the answers on the web.
Presently in US ham radio data bandwith:
2 meters is 20 khz max, 19.6 kilobauds
70 cm is 100 khz max, 56 kilobauds
Ironically, while there is plenty of space on 70 cm, other modes like
ATV are permitted to occupy up to 6 MHz of bandwidth.
Since we have a nice mix of hams from all over the world on this list,
I'd appreciated a reply (can be off list) on what is permitted in your
country on 2 meters and 70 cm.
Thanks,
Steve, KB9MWR
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
In the Netherlands, if it fits in the bandlimits you can legaly use it
regardless
of mode, band or speeds.
Offcourse you have to wonder if it is smart to use a small band like 2
meter (2 MHz wide) with very wide modes.
73 Andre PE1RDW
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
2:07 p.m.
Yes... in the USA anyway the FCC Part 97 States Maximum Symbol rate
50 and 144 Mhz 19.2Kb 20Khz
222 and 420 Mhz 56k 100 Khz
73 jerry
-----Original Message-----
From: 44net-bounces+jkutche=lehighcement.com(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
[mailto:44net-bounces+jkutche=lehighcement.com@hamradio.ucsd.edu] On Behalf Of Lin
Holcomb
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2013 1:52 PM
To: AMPRNet working group
Subject: Re: [44net] data bandwidth in other countries
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
A question...is it really limited in bandwidth to 19.6K on 2m and 56K on
440 or is it just that this is the maximum used by the modes in common use?
While at Data Radio (now calamp) we had 56K on a standard 20KHz channel for Police/Fire
and Utilities. Their Viper Radio claims 32kbps on a 12.5khz channel. (as you know there
are no more 20khz freq for commercial)
Lin
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 1:14 PM, PE1RDW <pe1rdw(a)amsat.org> wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
On 20-12-13 19:01, kb9mwr(a)gmail.com wrote:
--
Lin Holcomb
Office: +1 404 806 5412
Mobile: +1 404 933 1595
Fax: +1 404 348 4250
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
Hello all,
I don't like the idea of regulatory discussions on this list.
However, I am curious (as it's pertinent to what we do on this list)
what the rules are in other counties for ham radio.. So far I
haven't had much luck finding the answers on the web.
Presently in US ham radio data bandwith:
2 meters is 20 khz max, 19.6 kilobauds
70 cm is 100 khz max, 56 kilobauds
Ironically, while there is plenty of space on 70 cm, other modes like
ATV are permitted to occupy up to 6 MHz of bandwidth.
Since we have a nice mix of hams from all over the world on this
list, I'd appreciated a reply (can be off list) on what is permitted
in your country on 2 meters and 70 cm.
Thanks,
Steve, KB9MWR
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/m
ailman/listinfo/44net&k=%2FbKrTk44aPYZerIbkX9lDw%3D%3D%0A&r=d2mJWYlz9
QfT7w4aQqZ4NYgDdfT35%2Bio3uxhqpdt4ew%3D%0A&m=OFx92Bt6XnoKTnm4OtGqJtOI
uoZjf2xwAbMuXcEzu1A%3D%0A&s=0949b5fee134d5a5b177259c7b1a0fde35d9af268
44be1d8c7b2f1d28c5f6e62
In the Netherlands, if it fits in the bandlimits you can legaly use
it
regardless of mode, band or speeds.
Offcourse you have to wonder if it is smart to use a small band like 2
meter (2 MHz wide) with very wide modes.
73 Andre PE1RDW
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/ma
ilman/listinfo/44net&k=%2FbKrTk44aPYZerIbkX9lDw%3D%3D%0A&r=d2mJWYlz9Qf
T7w4aQqZ4NYgDdfT35%2Bio3uxhqpdt4ew%3D%0A&m=OFx92Bt6XnoKTnm4OtGqJtOIuoZ
jf2xwAbMuXcEzu1A%3D%0A&s=0949b5fee134d5a5b177259c7b1a0fde35d9af26844be
1d8c7b2f1d28c5f6e62
2:08 p.m.
Australia just has bandwidth limits, nothing about baud rate:
For 2200m & 600m: 2.1kHz
For 160m to 15m: 8kHz
For 10m: 16kHz
For 6m & 2m: 100kHz
For 70cm and up: unlimited
For details refer to the licence conditions document:
http://www.wia.org.au/members/legislation/determinations/documents/Radiocom…
73,
Matt VK2RQ
On 21/12/2013, at 5:14 AM, PE1RDW <pe1rdw(a)amsat.org> wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
On 20-12-13 19:01, kb9mwr(a)gmail.com wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
Hello all,
I don't like the idea of regulatory discussions on this list.
However, I am curious (as it's pertinent to what we do on this list)
what the rules are in other counties for ham radio.. So far I haven't
had much luck finding the answers on the web.
Presently in US ham radio data bandwith:
2 meters is 20 khz max, 19.6 kilobauds
70 cm is 100 khz max, 56 kilobauds
Ironically, while there is plenty of space on 70 cm, other modes like
ATV are permitted to occupy up to 6 MHz of bandwidth.
Since we have a nice mix of hams from all over the world on this list,
I'd appreciated a reply (can be off list) on what is permitted in your
country on 2 meters and 70 cm.
Thanks,
Steve, KB9MWR
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
In the Netherlands, if it fits in
the bandlimits you can legaly use it regardless of mode, band or speeds.
Offcourse you have to wonder if it is smart to use a small band like 2 meter (2 MHz wide)
with very wide modes.
73 Andre PE1RDW
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net 
2:13 p.m.
Hello Steve,
In Poland we have the following:
2 meters 1200 - 2400 bauds 12.5kHz
70 cm 9600 - 19200 bauds 12.5kHz
1.GHz over 19200 bauds 12.5kHz
Polish authority do not restrict
transmission speed but only bandwidth.
Best regards.
Janusz - sp1lop
Tom - sp2lob
2:34 p.m.
Użytkownik sp2lob napisał:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
Hello Steve,
In Poland we have the following:
2 meters 1200 - 2400 bauds 12.5kHz
70 cm 9600 - 19200 bauds 12.5kHz
1.GHz over 19200 bauds 12.5kHz
Correction
1.2GHz over 19200baud and more, deviation 25-50KHz
Polish authority do not restrict
transmission speed but only bandwidth.
Best regards.
Janusz - sp1lop
Tom - sp2lob
--
73 de Janusz / SP1LOP
===== Janusz J. Przybylski, SP1LOP ==================
Poland AMPRNet Co-ordinator [44.165/16] from Mar 2003
=====================================================
5 p.m.
No baud rate limitation in Canada only bandwidth.
see http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/smt-gst.nsf/eng/sf01226.html#sche1
Bob
On 13-12-20 01:01 PM, kb9mwr(a)gmail.com wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
Hello all,
I don't like the idea of regulatory discussions on this list.
However, I am curious (as it's pertinent to what we do on this list)
what the rules are in other counties for ham radio.. So far I haven't
had much luck finding the answers on the web.
Presently in US ham radio data bandwith:
2 meters is 20 khz max, 19.6 kilobauds
70 cm is 100 khz max, 56 kilobauds
Ironically, while there is plenty of space on 70 cm, other modes like
ATV are permitted to occupy up to 6 MHz of bandwidth.
Since we have a nice mix of hams from all over the world on this list,
I'd appreciated a reply (can be off list) on what is permitted in your
country on 2 meters and 70 cm.
Thanks,
Steve, KB9MWR
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
23 Dec
23 Dec
7:09 a.m.
New subject: Merry Xmas!
To all participants of the list,
Merry Christmas, very prosperous and Happy New 2014 Year!
Best regards.
Tom - sp2lob
9:37 a.m.
New subject: Merry Xmas!
Same to you Tom.
Harold
K7ILO
On Dec 23, 2013 4:11 AM, <sp2lob(a)tlen.pl> wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
To all participants of the list,
Merry Christmas, very prosperous and Happy New 2014 Year!
Best regards.
Tom - sp2lob
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
10:32 a.m.
New subject: Amprnet Gateway and Dynamic DNS.
Hi all,
I've just got back to experimenting with IP over ax.25 after many years.
I've got rip44d running on my Raspberry PI, and my gateway registered on the
portal. My ISP doesn't supply static IP addresses, so I'm using no-ip for
dynamic DNS.
I'm planning to add support for the gateway to my BPQ32/LinBPQ ax.25 node
software, but after searching the web, I can't find any info on how the
Amprnet Gateway handles dynamic dns.
So I have a few questions. Can anyone help with the answers?
Does the gateway re-resolve each hostname before sending out each rip44
update? Or is the name just resolved to an address when it is added to the
portal?
Is there any mechanism for uses to send RIP messages back to the gateway
when their addresses change?
Is it possible to get a version of encap.txt that lists hoatnames instead of
IP addresses, so uses can resolve them themselves?
Thanks,
John G8BPQ
11:13 a.m.
New subject: Amprnet Gateway and Dynamic DNS.
with Net44 you have a static IP directly, no need dyndns is well
you can write the ip 44.xx.xx.xx in setting DYNDNS!
André ON4HU
Le 23/12/13 16:32, John Wiseman a écrit :
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
Hi all,
I've just got back to experimenting with IP over ax.25 after many years.
I've got rip44d running on my Raspberry PI, and my gateway registered on the
portal. My ISP doesn't supply static IP addresses, so I'm using no-ip for
dynamic DNS.
I'm planning to add support for the gateway to my BPQ32/LinBPQ ax.25 node
software, but after searching the web, I can't find any info on how the
Amprnet Gateway handles dynamic dns.
So I have a few questions. Can anyone help with the answers?
Does the gateway re-resolve each hostname before sending out each rip44
update? Or is the name just resolved to an address when it is added to the
portal?
Is there any mechanism for uses to send RIP messages back to the gateway
when their addresses change?
Is it possible to get a version of encap.txt that lists hoatnames instead of
IP addresses, so uses can resolve them themselves?
Thanks,
John G8BPQ
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
--
forum => http://on4hu.be/phpbb/ inscrivez vous? New MediaWiki =>
http://on4hu.be/MediaWiki http://on4hu.dyndns.org:81/ http://www.on4hu.be/
ftp://ftp.on4hu.be/ ou ftp://on4hu.dyndns.org/ COMPUTERS ARE LIKE
AIR-CONDITIONERS THEY STOP WORKING PROPERLY AS SOON AS YOU OPEN WINDOWS.
12:11 p.m.
New subject: Amprnet Gateway and Dynamic DNS.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 23/12/2013 16:32, John Wiseman wrote:
Does the gateway re-resolve each hostname before
sending out each
rip44 update? Or is the name just resolved to an address when it is
added to the portal?
The hostnames provided on the portal for your gateway is updated once
every hour AFAIK.
73 de Marc, LX1DUC
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=1t5o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
12:27 p.m.
New subject: Amprnet Gateway and Dynamic DNS.
On Mon, 2013-12-23 at 15:32 +0000, John Wiseman wrote:
I'm planning to add support for the gateway to my
BPQ32/LinBPQ ax.25 node
software, but after searching the web, I can't find any info on how the
Amprnet Gateway handles dynamic dns.
LinBPQ handles 44-net fine as it is now with the exception of how it
handles ARP from what I see. Windows however is a totally different
story all it's own. There is no native ip protocol 4 support in windows.
XRouter/XR32 claim to handle it, but I have yet to see it work properly.
You may want to consider a pseudo nic for Windows for ipencap (similar
to linux's tunl0 interface) to handle this. It may also be a can of
worms you may not want to open.
Does the gateway re-resolve each hostname before
sending out each rip44
update? Or is the name just resolved to an address when it is added to the
portal?
I believe hourly, however Chris and/or Brian Kantor can verify.
Is there any mechanism for uses to send RIP messages
back to the gateway
when their addresses change?
When the gateway is configured properly in the portal, there's no need
to send RIP back. The portal will do the hostname resolutions prior to
building a new encap.txt and rip table.
Is it possible to get a version of encap.txt that
lists hoatnames instead of
IP addresses, so uses can resolve them themselves?
If there's a need for users to resolve dynamic commerical IPs
themselves, then something is wrong with the user's config. Just like
with a phone, internet routes via a series of numbers. A hostname is for
human-use moreso than for routing. If we were to eliminate DNS online, i
don't think ampr.org would have any routing but 44/8 does.
--
73 de Brian Rogers - N1URO
email: <n1uro(a)n1uro.ampr.org>
Web: http://www.n1uro.net/
Ampr1: http://n1uro.ampr.org/
Ampr2: http://nos.n1uro.ampr.org
Linux Amateur Radio Services
axMail-Fax & URONode
AmprNet coordinator for:
Connecticut, Delaware, Maine,
Maryland, Massachusetts,
New Hampshire, Pennsylvania,
Rhode Island, and Vermont.
12:48 p.m.
New subject: Amprnet Gateway and Dynamic DNS.
Hi John ,
Looooooong time no speak!
I use a cname entry. My g7ltt.ampr.org name is cnamed to g7ltt.dyndns.org.
The upshot is that the station trying to connect to me does the DNS
chasedown rather than the ampr.org server. I only ever need to update the
gateway server once and let my firewall take care of dyndns.
This works with MX records too (heard from g1plt lately? ).
Mark
On Dec 23, 2013 10:32 AM, "John Wiseman" <john.wiseman(a)cantab.net>
wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
Hi all,
I've just got back to experimenting with IP over ax.25 after many years.
I've got rip44d running on my Raspberry PI, and my gateway registered on
the
portal. My ISP doesn't supply static IP addresses, so I'm using no-ip for
dynamic DNS.
I'm planning to add support for the gateway to my BPQ32/LinBPQ ax.25 node
software, but after searching the web, I can't find any info on how the
Amprnet Gateway handles dynamic dns.
So I have a few questions. Can anyone help with the answers?
Does the gateway re-resolve each hostname before sending out each rip44
update? Or is the name just resolved to an address when it is added to the
portal?
Is there any mechanism for uses to send RIP messages back to the gateway
when their addresses change?
Is it possible to get a version of encap.txt that lists hoatnames instead
of
IP addresses, so uses can resolve them themselves?
Thanks,
John G8BPQ
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
1:41 p.m.
New subject: Amprnet Gateway and Dynamic DNS.
Mark,
I'm interested in your statement regarding CNAMES and MX records because I
tried a couple of configs that didn't work. Then I remembered that RFC 1912
(section 2.4) specifically disallows the use of CNAMES in combination with
other records, like MX. Also, I see no entry in DNS for g7ltt.dyndns.org.
Instead, it looks like the CNAME for g7ltt.ampr.org is ni2o.ampr.org.
So can you be more specific? For example, what is your situation and what
entries did you make in DNS to solve it?
Thanks,
Michael
N6MEF
-----Original Message-----
Hi John ,
Looooooong time no speak!
I use a cname entry. My g7ltt.ampr.org name is cnamed to g7ltt.dyndns.org.
The upshot is that the station trying to connect to me does the DNS
chasedown rather than the ampr.org server. I only ever need to update the
gateway server once and let my firewall take care of dyndns.
This works with MX records too (heard from g1plt lately? ).
Mark
12:15 p.m.
New subject: Merry Xmas!
Tomasz et al;
On Mon, 2013-12-23 at 13:09 +0100, sp2lob(a)tlen.pl wrote:
To all participants of the list,
Merry Christmas, very prosperous and Happy New 2014 Year!
Same to you and everyone on the list!
--
73 de Brian Rogers - N1URO
email: <n1uro(a)n1uro.ampr.org>
Web: http://www.n1uro.net/
Ampr1: http://n1uro.ampr.org/
Ampr2: http://nos.n1uro.ampr.org
Linux Amateur Radio Services
axMail-Fax & URONode
AmprNet coordinator for:
Connecticut, Delaware, Maine,
Maryland, Massachusetts,
New Hampshire, Pennsylvania,
Rhode Island, and Vermont.
3986
days inactive
3989
days old
16 comments
16 participants
participants (16)
-
Bob Tenty -
Brian Rogers -
Harold Kinchelow -
Janusz Przybylski SP1LOP -
John Wiseman -
kb9mwr＠gmail.com -
Kutche, Jerry (Mitchell) USA -
Lin Holcomb -
Marc, LX1DUC -
Mark Phillips -
Matt VK2RQ -
Michael E. Fox - N6MEF -
on4hu -
PE1RDW -
sp2lob -
sp2lob＠tlen.pl