I am starting to hear from folks in my area that we are starting to allocate IPV6 addresses? From what I have read on the reflector that is not true. There were some testing from limited folks, but that is all. As far as I can tell there is really no need to start issuing IPv6 addresses since we have not dish out all of the current available IPv4 addresses.
K6DLC
We do have ::ffff:2c00:0000 through to ::ffff:2cff:ffff :-)
/Matt VK2RQ
On 08/09/2013, at 7:06 AM, Brian Kantor Brian@ucsd.edu wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages) _______________________________________________ On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 01:50:13PM -0700, Daniel Curry wrote:
I am starting to hear from folks in my area that we are starting to allocate IPV6 addresses?
Not that I know of. We don't have any to allocate.
- Brian
44Net mailing list 44Net@hamradio.ucsd.edu http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net http://www.ampr.org/donate.html
On Sun, 8 Sep 2013, Matt VK2RQ wrote:
We do have ::ffff:2c00:0000 through to ::ffff:2cff:ffff :-)
Not really routable - on the other hand some would say neither is net 44. :)
Antonio Querubin e-mail: tony@lavanauts.org xmpp: antonioquerubin@gmail.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 07/09/2013 22:50, Daniel Curry wrote:
As far as I can tell there is really no need to start issuing IPv6 addresses since we have not dish out all of the current available IPv4 addresses.
What about systems reachable via IPv6 only outside of 44net, how do you connect to those (without adding another layer of tunneling)? :-)
IPv6 is not limited to where you come from but also to where you want to go to :-D
73 de Marc, LX1DUC
Wouldn't it be a good start in using IPv6 to add the possibility to assign an AAAA DNS record to existing ampr host names?
IMHO since IPv6 addresses are globally routable and NAT is not applicable, there is no need for tunnels. Of course there is the issue of non-ham traffic over radio links, but this could be a start.
73s de Marius, YO2LOJ