28 Jul
2021
28 Jul
'21
4:25 p.m.
Hello Ian!
Speaking as the TAC again, RPKI ROAs and route(6) objects are also something we worked on.
It’s going to be proposed later, definitely after the summer, and will hopefully help many
users and make Internet routing more secure for everyone!
Thanks,
Antonis
On 28 Jul 2021, at 23:03, Ian Chilton
<ian(a)chilton.me.uk> wrote:
Hi,
Totally agree with all of the points about IPv6!
On a related note….
I’m sure this has been discussed many times over, but with so many announcing 44 space
with BGP, I think going forward it’s important to be able
to create RPKI ROAs (and IRRDB objects) for the space.
Thanks,
Ian
28 Jul
28 Jul
4:39 p.m.
New subject: Future of AMPRNet Should NOT BE AMPRNet
Regarding IRR DB, ARDC now has an account on RADB, so if you need a route object creating
please let me know.
73,
Chris - G1FEF
On 28 Jul 2021, at 22:25, Antonios Chariton (daknob)
via 44Net <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> wrote:
Hello Ian!
Speaking as the TAC again, RPKI ROAs and route(6) objects are also something we worked
on. It’s going to be proposed later, definitely after the summer, and will hopefully help
many users and make Internet routing more secure for everyone!
Thanks,
Antonis
On 28 Jul 2021, at 23:03, Ian Chilton
<ian(a)chilton.me.uk> wrote:
Hi,
Totally agree with all of the points about IPv6!
On a related note….
I’m sure this has been discussed many times over, but with so many announcing 44 space
with BGP, I think going forward it’s important to be able
to create RPKI ROAs (and IRRDB objects) for the space.
Thanks,
Ian
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net
1215
days inactive
1215
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Antonios Chariton (daknob) -
G1FEF