23 Mar
2013
23 Mar
'13
6:19 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Good evening dear OMs,
I'm really new to this Mailing-List. I have been reading through the
information available online but I have a few remaining questions:
- - Can there be more than 1 coordinator for one single area (e.g. 2 OMs
handling a country conjointly)?
- - Do the former tunnels still exist for delegations which haven't been
moved/migrated to the new portal? (Or are they offline from the
Internet side of things?)
- - The new system/portal seems to favor a mesh network of tunnels, are
intra-country tunnels (no directly connected to the AMPR gateway but
connected via a local gateway (which in turn is connected to the AMPR
gateway)) depreciated or unrecommended?
- - When I checked a few years ago, very very few networks within
44.0.0.0/8 were announced in the DFZ (like 1 or 2), this seems to have
increased. Is it recommended today to announce a delegation or parts
of it directly?
I'm sorry if these questions have been answered before, I really tried
finding them, but I might have searched using the wrong terms/words.
vy 73 de Marc, LX1DUC
- --
http://lx1duc.mcs.tel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=AKXa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
23 Mar
23 Mar
8:46 p.m.
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 11:19:34PM +0100, Marc, LX1DUC wrote:
- - Can there be more than 1 coordinator for one
single area (e.g. 2 OMs
handling a country conjointly)?
There can be. Usually they agree to split things up geographically or
in some other logical manner.
I prefer people to work together so that there is no ambiguity as to
who to contact for help or allocation services.
- - Do the former tunnels still exist for delegations
which haven't been
moved/migrated to the new portal? (Or are they offline from the
Internet side of things?)
The portal does not list delegations for areas that do not have a
coordinator as there is no obvious person to contact for allocation
services. Generally I handle requests from those areas.
Tunnel gateways may exist for areas which currently don't have a coordinator.
- - The new system/portal seems to favor a mesh
network of tunnels, are
intra-country tunnels (no directly connected to the AMPR gateway but
connected via a local gateway (which in turn is connected to the AMPR
gateway)) depreciated or unrecommended?
Tunnels do not have to connect to the AMPR gateway. People are free
to set them up this way if they wish. Sweden plans to provide
tunnel facilities from its own gateway system, for example.
- - When I checked a few years ago, very very few
networks within
44.0.0.0/8 were announced in the DFZ (like 1 or 2), this seems to have
increased. Is it recommended today to announce a delegation or parts
of it directly?
Direct BGP announcements of CIDR blocks are permitted with special
permission. Generally, these are for technically sophisticated projects.
There are currently a few blocks being announced this way. There are
over two hundred tunnel gateways listed. People may find it easier to
set up a tunnel gateway with their smaller networking facilities.
- Brian
24 Mar
24 Mar
11:26 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Thank you very much for the answers.
On 24/03/2013 01:46, Brian Kantor wrote:
I prefer people to work together so that there is no
ambiguity as
to who to contact for help or allocation services.
I have raised this question as the board of the LX Amateur Society
will discuss the different manager positions and there seems to be a
tendency to make a working group of several people responsible to
share the work load and combine the knowledge/experience.
Tunnels do not have to connect to the AMPR gateway.
People are
free to set them up this way if they wish. Sweden plans to
provide tunnel facilities from its own gateway system, for
example.
In LX we have been discussing a similar approach in order to keep
traffic local and reduce latency while providing 2 or more highly
available AMPR gateway towards the other 44nets.
vy 73 de Marc, LX1DUC
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=Miy6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
4261
days inactive
4262
days old
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Brian Kantor -
Marc, LX1DUC