Well seems every platform is a bit different. The ip route command works a bit different from Debian to Redhat. Here are the errors when I tried to run rip44d on CentOS platform:
route del failed: 'LANG=C /sbin/ip route del 44.183.0.0/255.255.0.0': Error: an inet prefix is expected rather than "44.183.0.0/255.255.0.0".
route add failed: 'LANG=C /sbin/ip route add 44.183.0.0/255.255.0.0 via 130.208.168.63 dev tunl0 window 840 onlink': Error: an inet prefix is expected rather than "44.183.0.0/255.255.0.0".
route del failed: 'LANG=C /sbin/ip route del 44.208.0.0/255.255.0.0': Error: an inet prefix is expected rather than "44.208.0.0/255.255.0.0".
route add failed: 'LANG=C /sbin/ip route add 44.208.0.0/255.255.0.0 via 94.101.48.134 dev tunl0 window 840 onlink': Error: an inet prefix is expected rather than "44.208.0.0/255.255.0.0".
route del failed: 'LANG=C /sbin/ip route del 44.142.0.0/255.254.0.0': Error: an inet prefix is expected rather than "44.142.0.0/255.254.0.0".
route add failed: 'LANG=C /sbin/ip route add 44.142.0.0/255.254.0.0 via
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 6:37 AM, kb9mwr@gmail.com wrote:
Well seems every platform is a bit different. The ip route command works a bit different from Debian to Redhat. Here are the errors when I tried to run rip44d on CentOS platform:
route del failed: 'LANG=C /sbin/ip route del 44.183.0.0/255.255.0.0': Error: an inet prefix is expected rather than "44.183.0.0/255.255.0.0".
This looks really odd. rip44d runs ip route commands with a prefix length, not a netmask. Was that with a current, unmodified version of rip44d (https://raw.github.com/hessu/rip44d/master/rip44d) ?
- Hessu
-
Heikki Hannikainen -
kb9mwr＠gmail.com