It was clearly a "race condition" based on message time stamps, no foul
just time being its usual self. :-)
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021, 5:52 PM Jeremy Cooper via 44Net <
44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> wrote:
A reply by the
ARDC IT director specifically requesting that abuse
reports be sent to abuse at
ardc.net <
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net> <mailto:abuse at
ardc.net
<https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net>> and you decide to
double down and list more potentially offending addresses publicly?
Interesting approach.
Ian VE7BST
Ian, I thought I was in a private conversation with Chris when I had
replied. It wasn’t until I had already sent the message that I saw that the
entire list was still CC’d. My apologies, but also a modicum of
understanding is also deserved, too.
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net