A reply by the ARDC IT director specifically requesting that abuse reports be sent to abuse at ardc.net https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net <mailto:abuse at ardc.net https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net> and you decide to double down and list more potentially offending addresses publicly?
Interesting approach.
Ian VE7BST
Ian, I thought I was in a private conversation with Chris when I had replied. It wasn’t until I had already sent the message that I saw that the entire list was still CC’d. My apologies, but also a modicum of understanding is also deserved, too.
It was clearly a "race condition" based on message time stamps, no foul just time being its usual self. :-)
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021, 5:52 PM Jeremy Cooper via 44Net < 44net@mailman.ampr.org> wrote:
A reply by the ARDC IT director specifically requesting that abuse
reports be sent to abuse at ardc.net < https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net%3E <mailto:abuse at ardc.net https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net> and you decide to double down and list more potentially offending addresses publicly?
Interesting approach.
Ian VE7BST
Ian, I thought I was in a private conversation with Chris when I had replied. It wasn’t until I had already sent the message that I saw that the entire list was still CC’d. My apologies, but also a modicum of understanding is also deserved, too.
44Net mailing list 44Net@mailman.ampr.org https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net
-
Dave Maddox -
Jeremy Cooper