27 Jun
2013
27 Jun
'13
8:27 p.m.
K7VE - John <k7ve(a)k7ve.org> wrote:
Great idea - wrong platform. Cisco specific solutions
aren't reachable for many.
Look at Linux (Raspberry Pi) solutions or powerful, affordable routers like MIkroTik and
common tunneling protocols like OpenVPN, L2TP, GRE, etc.
The big advantage of Cisco
DMVPN is that it can create a fully meshed tunnel network with endpoints
on dynamic addresses, with only one (or a few) central hubs on static addresses, fully
automatically.
It is like what you have with a JNOS or Linux route importing encap.txt all the time, but
without the hassle.
Other VPN solutions are usually hub-and-spoke, where all internode traffic goes through
the central hub.
It is like connecting to net-44 by tunneling everything to 169.228.66.251 instead of
loading a routing table.
Rob
27 Jun
27 Jun
9:39 p.m.
New subject: 44Net Digest, Vol 2, Issue 77
Other systems have "Mesh" style networking as well.
------------------------------
John D. Hays
K7VE
PO Box 1223, Edmonds, WA 98020-1223
<http://k7ve.org/blog> <http://twitter.com/#!/john_hays>
<http://www.facebook.com/john.d.hays>
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Rob Janssen <pe1chl(a)amsat.org> wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
K7VE - John <k7ve(a)k7ve.org> <k7ve(a)k7ve.org> wrote:
Great idea - wrong platform. Cisco specific solutions aren't reachable
for many.
Look at Linux (Raspberry Pi) solutions or powerful, affordable routers
like MIkroTik and common tunneling protocols like OpenVPN, L2TP, GRE, etc.
The big advantage of Cisco DMVPN is that it can create a fully meshed
tunnel network with endpoints
on dynamic addresses, with only one (or a few) central hubs on static
addresses, fully automatically.
It is like what you have with a JNOS or Linux route importing encap.txt
all the time, but without the hassle.
Other VPN solutions are usually hub-and-spoke, where all internode traffic
goes through the central hub.
It is like connecting to net-44 by tunneling everything to 169.228.66.251
instead of loading a routing table.
Rob
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
http://www.ampr.org/donate.html
11:55 p.m.
New subject: 44Net Digest, Vol 2, Issue 77
Rob,
I like your thinking. Are you a Cisco guy too? I have been for too long :-)
I am still partial to hardware based solutions.
Jesse - WC3XS, CCNP Voice, CCNP RS, CCDA
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 27, 2013, at 3:27 PM, Rob Janssen <pe1chl(a)amsat.org> wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
K7VE - John <k7ve(a)k7ve.org> wrote:
Great idea - wrong platform. Cisco specific
solutions aren't reachable for many.
Look at Linux (Raspberry Pi) solutions or powerful, affordable routers like MIkroTik and
common tunneling protocols like OpenVPN, L2TP, GRE, etc.
The big advantage of Cisco
DMVPN is that it can create a fully meshed tunnel network with endpoints
on dynamic addresses, with only one (or a few) central hubs on static addresses, fully
automatically.
It is like what you have with a JNOS or Linux route importing encap.txt all the time, but
without the hassle.
Other VPN solutions are usually hub-and-spoke, where all internode traffic goes through
the central hub.
It is like connecting to net-44 by tunneling everything to 169.228.66.251 instead of
loading a routing table.
Rob
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
http://www.ampr.org/donate.html
3966
days inactive
3966
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Jesse Hindmarsh -
K7VE - John -
Rob Janssen