My speicific issue here is that my local AMPR
coordinator recently told me that unless all my IP addresses had a DNS entry, I risked
loosing my allocations. I think this is a policy that *he* is setting himself (not a
global AMPR policy) and
though I don't agree with his view, I obliged to give him ~1024 hostnames to fill
things out. If other AMPR coordinators have similar approaches, then DNS entries mean
everything to the IP allocation be it a subnet or a /32.
--David
KI6ZHD
This is not how I handle allocations... in the area I manage one can allocate individual
addresses or subnets, and when
they are subnets the address range of the subnet is reserved but not each address in the
subnet needs to have a name attached.
However, all traffic for addresses without associated name in .ampr.org is filtered at our
internet gateway. So when you want
to actually *use* an address outside the local radio network, it has to have a name.
(this is the same policy as in the gateway at UCSD)
Rob