27 Apr
2024
27 Apr
'24
11:42 a.m.
Hello all,
Has anybody else requested a new IPv4 subnet space allocation via BGP since the new portal
has been released?
I'm asking this because I've requested on 18th of this month a new one, and until
today no answer or update on the ticket.
I've tried to reach out to Chris directly, but I had no answer on my previous email.
I'm just wondering if anybody else had it's request resolved, since I had another
1-2 tickets opened and resolved after 1-2 days, and this one is still unassigned and in
the new state.
I do apologize in advance if this is a stupid question, but since my other tickets were
resolved "quickly", I thought to ask if somebody else had requested and received
a response.
Have a lovely weekend ahead and 73's!
Thanks,
Razvan - YO6RZV
Web: https://yo6rzv.ro
27 Apr
27 Apr
11:52 a.m.
This is the problem of a many respondent ticket system.
If you had one coordinator responsible for your area,
then you would not have to ask as they would do it all.
On 4/27/2024 11:42 AM, razvan--- via 44net wrote:
resolved after 1-2 days, and this one is still
unassigned
--
Charles J. Hargrove - N2NOV
NYC-ARECS/RACES Citywide Radio Officer/Skywarn Coord.
NYC-ARECS/RACES Nets 441.100/136.5 PL
ARnewsline Broadcast Mon. @ 8:00PM
NYC-ARECS Weekly Net Mon. @ 8:30PM
http://www.nyc-arecs.org
NY-NBEMS Net Saturdays @ 10AM & USeast-NBEMS Net Wednesdays @ 7PM
on 7.036 Mhz USB (alt 3.536)/1500 hz waterfall spot; MFSK-16 or 32
"Information is the oxygen of the modern age. It seeps through the walls
topped
by barbed wire, it wafts across the electrified borders." - Ronald Reagan
"The more corrupt the state, the more it legislates." - Tacitus
"Molann an obair an fear" - Irish Saying
(The work praises the man.)
"No matter how big and powerful government gets, and the many services it
provides, it can never take the place of volunteers." - Ronald Reagan
noon
On 2024-04-27 18:52, Charles J. Hargrove via 44net wrote:
This is the problem of a many respondent ticket
system.
If you had one coordinator responsible for your area,
then you would not have to ask as they would do it all.
On 4/27/2024 11:42 AM, razvan--- via 44net wrote:
Hello Charles,
The subnet where I submitted the request is 44.32.0.0/16. This was the
only subnet available for BGP requests at the time I sent the request.
Since it's a "big" subnet and on the portal it displays that is under
User - AMPRNet - AMPRNET, I guess that only ARDC Administration is able
to process the request.
Am I wrong?
--
Thanks,
Razvan - YO6RZV
Licensed HAM Operator in YO
Web: www.yo6rzv.ro
73's
resolved after 1-2 days, and this one is still
unassigned
--
Charles J. Hargrove - N2NOV
NYC-ARECS/RACES Citywide Radio Officer/Skywarn Coord.
NYC-ARECS/RACES Nets 441.100/136.5 PL
ARnewsline Broadcast Mon. @ 8:00PM
NYC-ARECS Weekly Net Mon. @ 8:30PM
http://www.nyc-arecs.org
NY-NBEMS Net Saturdays @ 10AM & USeast-NBEMS Net Wednesdays @ 7PM
on 7.036 Mhz USB (alt 3.536)/1500 hz waterfall spot; MFSK-16 or 32
"Information is the oxygen of the modern age. It seeps through the
walls topped
by barbed wire, it wafts across the electrified borders." - Ronald
Reagan
"The more corrupt the state, the more it legislates." - Tacitus
"Molann an obair an fear" - Irish Saying
(The work praises the man.)
"No matter how big and powerful government gets, and the many services
it
provides, it can never take the place of volunteers." - Ronald Reagan
_______________________________________________
44net mailing list -- 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 44net-leave(a)mailman.ampr.org
12:06 p.m.
No, you are not wrong. In the past, if a user in the areas that I
handled asked for normal subnets and also a BGP, I would have spoken
with the requestor and handled the normal subnets while forwarding on
the BGP request. Both I and the requestor would know what was going on.
This ticketing system is up in the air, with multiple respondents that
are not the coordinators for a particular area and everyone is left
guessing, as you are now.
On 4/27/2024 12:00 PM, Razvan wrote:
Since it's a "big" subnet and on the
portal it displays that is under
User - AMPRNet - AMPRNET, I guess that only ARDC Administration is able
to process the request.
Am I wrong?
--
Charles J. Hargrove - N2NOV
NYC-ARECS/RACES Citywide Radio Officer/Skywarn Coord.
NYC-ARECS/RACES Nets 441.100/136.5 PL
ARnewsline Broadcast Mon. @ 8:00PM
NYC-ARECS Weekly Net Mon. @ 8:30PM
http://www.nyc-arecs.org
NY-NBEMS Net Saturdays @ 10AM & USeast-NBEMS Net Wednesdays @ 7PM
on 7.036 Mhz USB (alt 3.536)/1500 hz waterfall spot; MFSK-16 or 32
"Information is the oxygen of the modern age. It seeps through the walls
topped
by barbed wire, it wafts across the electrified borders." - Ronald Reagan
"The more corrupt the state, the more it legislates." - Tacitus
"Molann an obair an fear" - Irish Saying
(The work praises the man.)
"No matter how big and powerful government gets, and the many services it
provides, it can never take the place of volunteers." - Ronald Reagan
12:13 p.m.
On 2024-04-27 19:06, Charles J. Hargrove via 44net wrote:
No, you are not wrong. In the past, if a user in the
areas that I
handled asked for normal subnets and also a BGP, I would have spoken
with the requestor and handled the normal subnets while forwarding on
the BGP request. Both I and the requestor would know what was going on.
This ticketing system is up in the air, with multiple respondents that
are not the coordinators for a particular area and everyone is left
guessing, as you are now.
On 4/27/2024 12:00 PM, Razvan wrote:
Understood, yeah, I
got it now.
I know we have a local coordinator here in YO, but he's only able to
handle the requests for 44.182.0.0/16, the subnet which was allocated
for YO, but those requests cannot be processed as BGP. If they could
have been, the whole process would have been flawless.
Thank you Charles for the confirmation.
I do not want to upset anybody or to keep on pushing, I know that Chris
has a lot on his plate right now, I just wanted to know what's happening
and why some tickets were responded and resolved in max 3 days since
they have been opened (in the same period as the IP Request ticket), and
an IP subnet request it's still without resolution after 10 days.
I've emailed Chris directly, off-list about this, but I'm thinking that
maybe at some point I've upset him and that's why I did not hear back
about my status update. HI!.
Allrighty, thanks again.
--
Thanks,
Razvan - YO6RZV
Licensed HAM Operator in YO
Web: www.yo6rzv.ro
73's
Since it's a "big" subnet and on
the portal it displays that is under
User - AMPRNet - AMPRNET, I guess that only ARDC Administration is
able to process the request.
Am I wrong?
--
Charles J. Hargrove - N2NOV
NYC-ARECS/RACES Citywide Radio Officer/Skywarn Coord.
NYC-ARECS/RACES Nets 441.100/136.5 PL
ARnewsline Broadcast Mon. @ 8:00PM
NYC-ARECS Weekly Net Mon. @ 8:30PM
http://www.nyc-arecs.org
NY-NBEMS Net Saturdays @ 10AM & USeast-NBEMS Net Wednesdays @ 7PM
on 7.036 Mhz USB (alt 3.536)/1500 hz waterfall spot; MFSK-16 or 32
"Information is the oxygen of the modern age. It seeps through the
walls topped
by barbed wire, it wafts across the electrified borders." - Ronald
Reagan
"The more corrupt the state, the more it legislates." - Tacitus
"Molann an obair an fear" - Irish Saying
(The work praises the man.)
"No matter how big and powerful government gets, and the many services
it
provides, it can never take the place of volunteers." - Ronald Reagan
_______________________________________________
44net mailing list -- 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 44net-leave(a)mailman.ampr.org
9:18 p.m.
This seems to be an indication of the ARDC thought process going
forward. State/regional coordinators might start thinking that their
days are numbered and we will all be tossed into one big mosh pit.
If certain projects like Hamnet, HamWan and others are left alone to
continue and add new members, while others are told to bugger off and
just deal with the new regime, then this is NOT the AMPR that Brian
Kantor and others envisioned.
"My ticket #xxxx was assigned to Chris Smith who indicated they are
moving away from the regional allocations and closed my ticket. He
didn’t say anything but I did find in My Networks that he assigned
44.61.y.zzz/29 block to me. No other information."
On 4/27/2024 12:13 PM, Razvan wrote:
On 2024-04-27 19:06, Charles J. Hargrove via 44net
wrote:
--
Charles J. Hargrove - N2NOV
NYC-ARECS/RACES Citywide Radio Officer/Skywarn Coord.
NYC-ARECS/RACES Nets 441.100/136.5 PL
ARnewsline Broadcast Mon. @ 8:00PM
NYC-ARECS Weekly Net Mon. @ 8:30PM
http://www.nyc-arecs.org
NY-NBEMS Net Saturdays @ 10AM & USeast-NBEMS Net Wednesdays @ 7PM
on 7.036 Mhz USB (alt 3.536)/1500 hz waterfall spot; MFSK-16 or 32
"Information is the oxygen of the modern age. It seeps through the walls
topped
by barbed wire, it wafts across the electrified borders." - Ronald Reagan
"The more corrupt the state, the more it legislates." - Tacitus
"Molann an obair an fear" - Irish Saying
(The work praises the man.)
"No matter how big and powerful government gets, and the many services it
provides, it can never take the place of volunteers." - Ronald Reagan
No, you are not wrong. In the past, if a user in
the areas that I
handled asked for normal subnets and also a BGP, I would have spoken
with the requestor and handled the normal subnets while forwarding on
the BGP request. Both I and the requestor would know what was going on.
This ticketing system is up in the air, with multiple respondents that
are not the coordinators for a particular area and everyone is left
guessing, as you are now.
On 4/27/2024 12:00 PM, Razvan wrote:
> Since it's a "big" subnet and on the portal it displays that is under
> User - AMPRNet - AMPRNET, I guess that only ARDC Administration is
> able to process the request.
>
> Am I wrong?
Understood, yeah, I got it now.
I know we have a local coordinator here in YO, but he's only able to
handle the requests for 44.182.0.0/16, the subnet which was allocated
for YO, but those requests cannot be processed as BGP. If they could
have been, the whole process would have been flawless.
Thank you Charles for the confirmation.
I do not want to upset anybody or to keep on pushing, I know that Chris
has a lot on his plate right now, I just wanted to know what's happening
and why some tickets were responded and resolved in max 3 days since
they have been opened (in the same period as the IP Request ticket), and
an IP subnet request it's still without resolution after 10 days.
I've emailed Chris directly, off-list about this, but I'm thinking that
maybe at some point I've upset him and that's why I did not hear back
about my status update. HI!.
Allrighty, thanks again.
18
days inactive
19
days old
5 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Charles J. Hargrove -
Razvan -
razvan＠yo6rzv.ro