9 Apr
2021
9 Apr
'21
10:46 a.m.
Thnaks for the feed back Keat
Well the AMPRnet space already goes trough part of the internet by VPN and those are
encrypted, The legality of ecryption does not extend to other mean of transport of a
signal then while on the RF side of things. NO?
________________________________________
De : 44Net <44net-bounces+petem001=hotmail.com(a)mailman.ampr.org> de la part de
Keaton Alexander Guger Lair via 44Net <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org>
Envoyé : 9 avril 2021 11:38
À : pete M via 44Net
Cc : Keaton Alexander Guger Lair
Objet : Re: [44net] Encrypted links on 5.8ghz. (WPA)
I believe you are correct regarding the legality here in Canada. Since
you would not be subject to the Amateur regulations if you go ISM. The
only other issue that then arises is if you are using AMPRnet space on
what then technically becomes a non-ham link, that is a question I'm not
even going to pretend to know the answer to.
73, VE5LPL
Sincerely,
Keaton Alexander Guger Lair
A Saskatchewian guy who does stuff and things
https://kagl.me me(a)kagl.me
On 2021-04-09 9:35 a.m., pete M via 44Net wrote:
I dont know what is the status of this case but I am
asking here if anyone had some factual information on this.
As we are using the frequency that are into the ISM band, We are also using device that
are type accepted for that band.
Those device are used legally with encryption by normal lambda user. If we dont modify
the device power and frequency would it be legal for ham to also encrypt the signal?
I understand that if we would use a higher power, different channel I would understand
that we are now out of the ISM band rules.
Pierre
VE2PF
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net