Thnaks for the feed back Keat
Well the AMPRnet space already goes trough part of the internet by VPN and those are encrypted, The legality of ecryption does not extend to other mean of transport of a signal then while on the RF side of things. NO?
________________________________________ De : 44Net 44net-bounces+petem001=hotmail.com@mailman.ampr.org de la part de Keaton Alexander Guger Lair via 44Net 44net@mailman.ampr.org Envoyé : 9 avril 2021 11:38 À : pete M via 44Net Cc : Keaton Alexander Guger Lair Objet : Re: [44net] Encrypted links on 5.8ghz. (WPA)
I believe you are correct regarding the legality here in Canada. Since you would not be subject to the Amateur regulations if you go ISM. The only other issue that then arises is if you are using AMPRnet space on what then technically becomes a non-ham link, that is a question I'm not even going to pretend to know the answer to.
73, VE5LPL
Sincerely, Keaton Alexander Guger Lair A Saskatchewian guy who does stuff and things https://kagl.me me@kagl.me
On 2021-04-09 9:35 a.m., pete M via 44Net wrote:
I dont know what is the status of this case but I am asking here if anyone had some factual information on this.
As we are using the frequency that are into the ISM band, We are also using device that are type accepted for that band.
Those device are used legally with encryption by normal lambda user. If we dont modify the device power and frequency would it be legal for ham to also encrypt the signal?
I understand that if we would use a higher power, different channel I would understand that we are now out of the ISM band rules.
Pierre VE2PF _________________________________________ 44Net mailing list 44Net@mailman.ampr.org https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net
_________________________________________ 44Net mailing list 44Net@mailman.ampr.org https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net