in that case, that opens the discussion about just who or what amprnet
ought include and connect with. Personally I've been long inclined to have
44net be just like any other /8 address space and fully internet connected
via bgp at multiple peering points, i.e. either we're part of the larger
internet with fully routable blocks or we're not. but as of right now,
that's not quite the case - amprnet is still largely isolated and amateur
to amateur via static tunnels.
so who and what should amprnet/44net be?
eric - af6ep
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 4:23 AM, sp2lob <sp2lob(a)tlen.pl> wrote:
> (Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
> _______________________________________________
> Eric.
> You're mistaken...
> I did NOT meant any sort of sarcasm at all!
> I just fully agree with Jason's point of view.
> Best regards.
> Tom - sp2lob
>