I couldn't agree more Brian
On 11 Oct 2014 15:32, "Brian" <n1uro(a)n1uro.ampr.org> wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
Andy et al;
On Sat, 2014-10-11 at 13:18 +0100, Andy Brittain wrote:
I think opening up 44 net is potentially a good
idea but then we run in
to trouble where RF is involved. Would we not be passing
traffic that
technically doesn’t fit under our license t’s&c’s?
Absolutely. That would easier open us up to pirating (why bother get a
license if it's freely available?) and put us in jeopardy for possible
violation of 3rd party communications regulations depending what the 3rd
party does.
--
73 de Brian Rogers - N1URO
email: <n1uro(a)n1uro.ampr.org>
Web:
http://www.n1uro.net/
Ampr1:
http://n1uro.ampr.org/
Ampr2:
http://nos.n1uro.ampr.org
Linux Amateur Radio Services
axMail-Fax & URONode
AmprNet coordinator for:
Connecticut, Delaware, Maine,
Maryland, Massachusetts,
New Hampshire, Pennsylvania,
Rhode Island, and Vermont.
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net