I couldn't agree more Brian On 11 Oct 2014 15:32, "Brian" n1uro@n1uro.ampr.org wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages) _______________________________________________ Andy et al; On Sat, 2014-10-11 at 13:18 +0100, Andy Brittain wrote:
I think opening up 44 net is potentially a good idea but then we run in
to trouble where RF is involved. Would we not be passing traffic that technically doesn’t fit under our license t’s&c’s?
Absolutely. That would easier open us up to pirating (why bother get a license if it's freely available?) and put us in jeopardy for possible violation of 3rd party communications regulations depending what the 3rd party does. -- 73 de Brian Rogers - N1URO email: n1uro@n1uro.ampr.org Web: http://www.n1uro.net/ Ampr1: http://n1uro.ampr.org/ Ampr2: http://nos.n1uro.ampr.org Linux Amateur Radio Services axMail-Fax & URONode AmprNet coordinator for: Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont.
44Net mailing list 44Net@hamradio.ucsd.edu http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net