I think opening up 44 net is potentially a good idea but then we run in to trouble where RF is involved. Would we not be passing traffic that technically doesn’t fit under our license t’s&c’s?
Andy G0HXT On 11 Oct 2014, at 12:44, Eric Fort eric.fort@gmail.com wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages) _______________________________________________ in that case, that opens the discussion about just who or what amprnet ought include and connect with. Personally I've been long inclined to have 44net be just like any other /8 address space and fully internet connected via bgp at multiple peering points, i.e. either we're part of the larger internet with fully routable blocks or we're not. but as of right now, that's not quite the case - amprnet is still largely isolated and amateur to amateur via static tunnels.
so who and what should amprnet/44net be?
eric - af6ep
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 4:23 AM, sp2lob sp2lob@tlen.pl wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages) _______________________________________________ Eric. You're mistaken... I did NOT meant any sort of sarcasm at all! I just fully agree with Jason's point of view. Best regards. Tom - sp2lob