19 Jul
2022
19 Jul
'22
5:43 p.m.
On 7/19/22 12:08, Toussaint OTTAVI via 44net wrote:
I just got my message back after a day because medi.fr mailserver is broken and my mail
cannot be sent to it.
(bad TLS configuration)
So you could not know that I sent you a warning. Sorry for that.
But still I think you should not send copies of your issue to current and previous members
of the TAC.
I don't like to get pulled into an existing conflict that is already getting out of
hand, as I have no say in the
policies and no way to resolve the conflict.
The suggestion to send it to this list is better.
Rob
You were in copy of those emails because :
1/ You are a member of the Technical Advisory Group, as stated here :
https://www.ampr.org/about/who-we-are/
If members of the TAC are not interested in technical issues with IP address management,
then, please accept my apology.
2/ You were on my personal list of people I considered skilled and valuable on this list.
It seems I made a mistake. Please accept, again, my apology.
I think you misunderstand the position of the TAC. The TAC is only ADVISORY. We do not
determine policy.
I am myself against the policy of renumbering existing allocations before a decision has
been made on how
to go forward with the network, but I have no influence on the ongoing practice as
implemented by Chris G1FEF.
(nor do I have a description of what that policy exactly entails)
even after I asked you not to do that.
Sorry, but I missed that. If I saw that answer, I would certainly not have bothered you
again with problems that are of no interest to you ;-) Sorry, again.