On 7/19/22 12:08, Toussaint OTTAVI via 44net wrote:
You were in copy of those emails because :
1/ You are a member of the Technical Advisory Group, as stated here : https://www.ampr.org/about/who-we-are/ If members of the TAC are not interested in technical issues with IP address management, then, please accept my apology.
2/ You were on my personal list of people I considered skilled and valuable on this list. It seems I made a mistake. Please accept, again, my apology.
I think you misunderstand the position of the TAC. The TAC is only ADVISORY. We do not determine policy. I am myself against the policy of renumbering existing allocations before a decision has been made on how to go forward with the network, but I have no influence on the ongoing practice as implemented by Chris G1FEF. (nor do I have a description of what that policy exactly entails)
even after I asked you not to do that.
Sorry, but I missed that. If I saw that answer, I would certainly not have bothered you again with problems that are of no interest to you ;-) Sorry, again.
I just got my message back after a day because medi.fr mailserver is broken and my mail cannot be sent to it. (bad TLS configuration)
So you could not know that I sent you a warning. Sorry for that. But still I think you should not send copies of your issue to current and previous members of the TAC. I don't like to get pulled into an existing conflict that is already getting out of hand, as I have no say in the policies and no way to resolve the conflict. The suggestion to send it to this list is better.
Rob