[44net] Re: 4 in 6 tunnel support

Awesome I did not see any documentation to that extent or config options for it in the portal. Can you please point me in the right direction. Scott From: Rob PE1CHL via 44net <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> Date: Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 4:56 AM To: 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> Subject: [44net] Re: 4 in 6 tunnel support We do offer that on our gateway. There is only one user (were 3 before), but still... I agree that there is some use case for it, e.g. with provider routers that have trouble with GRE over NAT. Rob On 11/29/22 20:56, Scott Gillins via 44net wrote: I was wondering if you had considered looking at a 4 in 6 tunnel support. I know that it may seem backwards with a lot of things moving to native v6 but the 44 net is a great resource for hams. One example of why I can see needing this is a lot of providers, specifically wireless, are doing a double or triple NAT of their own ipv4 address space. While this is OK for most internet activities it is not good to support inbound connections. You do however get a native IPV6 address that is not nated and fully routable. Having a headend location to support a 4 in 6 tunnel would help a lot of folks. I do support large networks as part of my day job and would be willing to help set up and support if you wanted to take this on. Thanks, Scott