hi, how about toning down the vitriol, and have a factual debate: your
aggressive tone does not make it any easier to raise a word in favour of
your view. you are underming any effort to quietly argue the case of more
oversight. where has your voice been before this broke? when discusssing
this amongst the interested irish radio hams your name and verbal contribution
is automatically identified as the cranky psycho, making any reasoned look
at your arguments impossible. that can hardly be your aim, you are effectively
discrediting yourself. you are strengthening your opponents with your
behavious. greetings from stefan, ei4ku (ex ei4hg, dg1hz)