hi, how about toning down the vitriol, and have a factual debate: your aggressive tone does not make it any easier to raise a word in favour of your view. you are underming any effort to quietly argue the case of more oversight. where has your voice been before this broke? when discusssing this amongst the interested irish radio hams your name and verbal contribution is automatically identified as the cranky psycho, making any reasoned look at your arguments impossible. that can hardly be your aim, you are effectively discrediting yourself. you are strengthening your opponents with your behavious. greetings from stefan, ei4ku (ex ei4hg, dg1hz)