10 Sep
2021
10 Sep
'21
5:04 a.m.
Le 10/09/2021 à 10:09, Chris Smith via 44Net a écrit :
No, the TAC proposal has not been approved yet. There
are many prefixes being announced via BGP (over 400 last time I checked) so routing only
44.190/16 to the internet is probably not a good idea as you will be unable to reach a lot
of 44 hosts.
Mailman has been on 44.76.7.7 for several years this is not new.
I never noticed any problem with mailman, because my email address is
hosted on a public cloud, and only my provider's mail server sent SMTP
messages to mailman. I never tried to access mailman in http before.
Our TKNet network is a "work in progress", and is mostly a "closed"
network for now. We announce 44.190.11.0/24 network on Internet. And we
route 44.190.0.0/16 to Internet (via our 44.190.11 gateway address).
About the rest of the 44 net, we currently do not route it anywhere,
because I don't know exactly where and how to route it (IP-IP mesh ?
eBGP HamNet ? Via tunnel ? to Internet ?). It seems the right way would
be to implement eBGP for HamNet, IP-IP for the rest of the world, and
set a default route to public Internet. But I never took time to
implement this.
I look forward to the decision of the TAC. We need to simplify and
clarify things, HI :-)