Re: [44net] ISP Router and Pi Cohabitation - 44net

5 Apr 2016

Many of the Linux based routers do allow you to add non-standard rules.  It
surprised me that the current ASUS family of consumer routers allowed me to
configure a porthole for IPIP without having to use the CLI.  
Assi

-----Original Message-----
From: 44Net [mailto:44net-bounces+assi=kiloxray.com@hamradio.ucsd.edu] On
Behalf Of Brian Kantor
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 11:11 AM
To: AMPRNet working group &lt;44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu&gt;
Subject: Re: [44net] ISP Router and Pi Cohabitation

(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 11:05:38AM -0700, Geoff Joy -KE6QH- wrote:
...
  I'm on FiOS (was Verizon now Frontier Comm.) and
I'm considering 
 buying a Pi for ampr.org connection. I'm pretty much stuck with the 
 Verizon Actiontec MI424WR on the WAN due to ISP requirements and I'm 
 wondering how it might be best to place the Pi on the LAN. Should it 
 be in the DMZ or should it stay behind NAT? 
I'm not familiar with that particular router, but most residential routers
don't have a provision for allowing the IPIP protocol through the NAT so you
pretty much have to use the DMZ for AMPRNet tunneling.
	- Brian
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net