22 Feb
2012
22 Feb
'12
6:18 p.m.
Sorry:
I crossed my outgoing with Brian and Davids incoming.
You're already on it
Bill
--------------------------
Well, for starters, it looks like the address you posted here is:
44.9.0.1, and you state belongs to WA6NMF.
However, I show no such address on the network.
I do show an address for WA6NMF, but it is 44.4.9.1 not 44.9.0.1.
wa6nmf IN A 44.4.9.1
wa6nmf-1 IN A 44.4.9.2
wa6nmf-2 IN A 44.4.9.3
wa6nmf-3 IN A 44.4.9.4
Now, I also show the 44.9.x.x as a discontinued range.
I also DO NOT show any entries at Fullers for either WA6NMF
or for any address starting with 44.9.x.x or any with 44.4.9.x
So, I'm curious as to where your entry came from ??
At 02:49 PM 02/22/12, you wrote:
No, I never said it belons to me.
I just got an error regarding that address while checking my routing infos.
It belongs to wa6nmf and should be corrected because it is wrong.
Wm Lewis (KG6BAJ)
AMPR Net IP Address Coordinator - Northern and Central California Regions
(A 100% Volunteer Group)
(530) 263-1595 (Home/Office)
______________________________________________
----------
This message is for the designated recipient only and MAY CONTAIN
PRIVILEGED OR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.
If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and
delete the original. Any other use of this E-mail is prohibited.
23 Feb
23 Feb
1:05 a.m.
New subject: Gateway ip/netmask pair
I think I generated a misunderstanding.
I took a look yesterday on the RIP data which I receive and therre was an
invalid entry regarding 44.9.0.1/255.255.255.252.
According to ftp://hamradio.ucsd.edu/pub/amprhosts it belonged to wa5nmf.
I just signaled this on the list so appropriate corrections could be made.
Which happened quickly and now it is ok, and is no longer on the list.
(I think Daniel, K6DLC did the corrections - TNX)
Regards!
Marius, YO2LOJ
From: 44net-bounces+marius=yo2loj.ro(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
[mailto:44net-bounces+marius=yo2loj.ro@hamradio.ucsd.edu] On Behalf Of
William Lewis
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 01:19
To: 44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
Subject: Re: [44net] Gateway ip/netmask pair
Sorry:
I crossed my outgoing with Brian and Davids incoming.
You're already on it
Bill
--------------------------
Well, for starters, it looks like the address you posted here is:
44.9.0.1, and you state belongs to WA6NMF.
However, I show no such address on the network.
I do show an address for WA6NMF, but it is 44.4.9.1 not 44.9.0.1.
wa6nmf IN A 44.4.9.1
wa6nmf-1 IN A 44.4.9.2
wa6nmf-2 IN A 44.4.9.3
wa6nmf-3 IN A 44.4.9.4
Now, I also show the 44.9.x.x as a discontinued range.
I also DO NOT show any entries at Fullers for either WA6NMF
or for any address starting with 44.9.x.x or any with 44.4.9.x
So, I'm curious as to where your entry came from ??
At 02:49 PM 02/22/12, you wrote:
No, I never said it belons to me.
I just got an error regarding that address while checking my routing infos.
It belongs to wa6nmf and should be corrected because it is wrong.
Wm Lewis (KG6BAJ)
AMPR Net IP Address Coordinator - Northern and Central California Regions
(A 100% Volunteer Group)
(530) 263-1595 (Home/Office)
______________________________________________
_____
This message is for the designated recipient only and MAY CONTAIN PRIVILEGED
OR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.
If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and
delete the original. Any other use of this E-mail is prohibited.
1:13 a.m.
New subject: Gateway ip/netmask pair
On 2/22/12 10:05 PM, Marius Petrescu wrote:
I think I generated a misunderstanding.
Not really - you generated some much needed discussion, at least for
this OM who is new to AMPRNet.
I took a look yesterday on the RIP data which I
receive and therre was
an invalid entry regarding 44.9.0.1/255.255.255.252.
Invalid because the subnet did not fall on a proper subnet boundary, or
invalid because 44.9 is invalid? It's now corrected to 44.4.9.1 but some
would still say it doesn't begin on a proper boundary.
According to ftp://hamradio.ucsd.edu/pub/amprhosts it
belonged to wa5nmf.
Well, WA*6*NMF, but that's close.
I just signaled this on the list so appropriate
corrections could be made.
Which happened quickly and now it is ok, and is no longer on the list.
Yes, now 44.4.9.1 is there through the same gateway. It is entered as
44.4.9.1/30. Perhaps some will complain because it's not 44.4.9.0/30 but
44.4.9.0 is not assigned to me.
(I think Daniel, K6DLC did the corrections - TNX)
Yes, thanks to Daniel -- he sent new addresses for me, but we're still
working out the subnet issue. Or maybe it's just me who's confused.
Cheers
David WA6NMF
3:31 a.m.
New subject: Gateway ip/netmask pair
David Josephson wrote:
Yes, now 44.4.9.1 is there through the same gateway. It is entered as 44.4.9.1/30.
Perhaps some will complain because it's not 44.4.9.0/30 but 44.4.9.0 is not assigned
to me.
44.4.9.1/30 is invalid. It will not be loaded in the Linux routing table.
NOS accepts it but only because it ANDs the given address with the subnet mask before
putting the entry in the routing table.
So after inserting 44.4.9.1/30 and looking at the resulting routing table you have
44.4.9.0/30
Rob
3:42 a.m.
New subject: Gateway ip/netmask pair
On 2/23/12 12:31 AM, Rob Janssen wrote:
David Josephson wrote:
Okay, so how to do this? The assigned addresses are 44.4.9.1 through 6.
Do I just call each one a separate /32 subnet?
David
Yes, now 44.4.9.1 is there through the same gateway. It is entered as
44.4.9.1/30. Perhaps some will complain because it's not 44.4.9.0/30
but 44.4.9.0 is not assigned to me.
44.4.9.1/30 is invalid. It will not be loaded
in the Linux routing table.
4:17 a.m.
New subject: Gateway ip/netmask pair
you in fact use 44.4.9.0 to 44.4.9.7
.0 is the network addres of the subnet, .7 is the bradcast address.
so you have to use 44.4.9.0/29 or 44.4.9.0/255.255.255.248
routed to your gateway.
On 2/23/12 12:31 AM, Rob Janssen wrote:
David Josephson wrote:
Okay, so how to do this? The assigned addresses are 44.4.9.1 through 6.
Do I just call each one a separate /32 subnet?
David
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
Yes, now 44.4.9.1 is there through the same gateway. It is entered as
44.4.9.1/30. Perhaps some will complain because it's not 44.4.9.0/30
but 44.4.9.0 is not assigned to me.
44.4.9.1/30 is invalid. It will not be loaded
in the Linux routing
table. 
2:08 p.m.
New subject: Gateway ip/netmask pair
gate@ampr-gateways:~/Bin$ ./range2subnet 44.4.9.1 44.4.9.3
Your range can only be expressed by several subnets:
44.4.9.1/32 44.4.9.1 to 44.4.9.1
44.4.9.2/31 44.4.9.2 to 44.4.9.3
Alternatively you can cover the range with the single subnet:
44.4.9.0/30 44.4.9.0 to 44.4.9.3
gate@ampr-gateways:~/Bin$ ./range2subnet 44.4.9.1 44.4.9.6
Your range can only be expressed by several subnets:
44.4.9.1/32 44.4.9.1 to 44.4.9.1
44.4.9.2/31 44.4.9.2 to 44.4.9.3
44.4.9.4/31 44.4.9.4 to 44.4.9.5
44.4.9.6/32 44.4.9.6 to 44.4.9.6
Alternatively you can cover the range with the single subnet:
44.4.9.0/29 44.4.9.0 to 44.4.9.7
Jim Fuller
N7VR -- http://www.n7vr.org
International TCP/IP Gateways Robot Operator -- http://www.ampr-gateways.org
MTAPRS NET Server Operator -- http://www.mtaprs.net
CWOP-2 -- http://www.wxqa.com
IRLP Node 3398 - http://irlp.fuller.net
Original ARECC contributor
-----Original Message-----
From: David Josephson [mailto:wa6nmf@josephson.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 1:43 AM
To: 44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
Subject: Re: [44net] Gateway ip/netmask pair
On 2/23/12 12:31 AM, Rob Janssen wrote:
David Josephson wrote:
Okay, so how to do this? The assigned addresses are 44.4.9.1 through 6.
Do I just call each one a separate /32 subnet?
David
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
Yes, now 44.4.9.1 is there through the same gateway. It is entered as
44.4.9.1/30. Perhaps some will complain because it's not 44.4.9.0/30
but 44.4.9.0 is not assigned to me.
44.4.9.1/30 is invalid. It will not be loaded
in the Linux routing table.
2:09 p.m.
New subject: Gateway ip/netmask pair
gate@ampr-gateways:~/Bin$ ./range2subnet 44.4.9.1 44.4.9.3
Your range can only be expressed by several subnets:
44.4.9.1/32 44.4.9.1 to 44.4.9.1
44.4.9.2/31 44.4.9.2 to 44.4.9.3
Alternatively you can cover the range with the single subnet:
44.4.9.0/30 44.4.9.0 to 44.4.9.3
gate@ampr-gateways:~/Bin$ ./range2subnet 44.4.9.1 44.4.9.6
Your range can only be expressed by several subnets:
44.4.9.1/32 44.4.9.1 to 44.4.9.1
44.4.9.2/31 44.4.9.2 to 44.4.9.3
44.4.9.4/31 44.4.9.4 to 44.4.9.5
44.4.9.6/32 44.4.9.6 to 44.4.9.6
Alternatively you can cover the range with the single subnet:
44.4.9.0/29 44.4.9.0 to 44.4.9.7
Jim Fuller
N7VR -- http://www.n7vr.org
International TCP/IP Gateways Robot Operator -- http://www.ampr-gateways.org
MTAPRS NET Server Operator -- http://www.mtaprs.net
CWOP-2 -- http://www.wxqa.com
IRLP Node 3398 - http://irlp.fuller.net
Original ARECC contributor
-----Original Message-----
From: David Josephson [mailto:wa6nmf@josephson.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 1:43 AM
To: 44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
Subject: Re: [44net] Gateway ip/netmask pair
On 2/23/12 12:31 AM, Rob Janssen wrote:
David Josephson wrote:
Okay, so how to do this? The assigned addresses are 44.4.9.1 through 6.
Do I just call each one a separate /32 subnet?
David
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
Yes, now 44.4.9.1 is there through the same gateway. It is entered as
44.4.9.1/30. Perhaps some will complain because it's not 44.4.9.0/30
but 44.4.9.0 is not assigned to me.
44.4.9.1/30 is invalid. It will not be loaded
in the Linux routing table.
4468
days inactive
4469
days old
7 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
David Josephson -
Jim Fuller - N7VR -
Marius Petrescu -
marius＠yo2loj.ro
-
Rob Janssen -
William Lewis