Sorry:
I crossed my outgoing with Brian and Davids incoming.
You're already on it
Bill
-------------------------- Well, for starters, it looks like the address you posted here is: 44.9.0.1, and you state belongs to WA6NMF.
However, I show no such address on the network.
I do show an address for WA6NMF, but it is 44.4.9.1 not 44.9.0.1.
wa6nmf IN A 44.4.9.1 wa6nmf-1 IN A 44.4.9.2 wa6nmf-2 IN A 44.4.9.3 wa6nmf-3 IN A 44.4.9.4
Now, I also show the 44.9.x.x as a discontinued range.
I also DO NOT show any entries at Fullers for either WA6NMF or for any address starting with 44.9.x.x or any with 44.4.9.x
So, I'm curious as to where your entry came from ??
At 02:49 PM 02/22/12, you wrote:
No, I never said it belons to me. I just got an error regarding that address while checking my routing infos. It belongs to wa6nmf and should be corrected because it is wrong.
Wm Lewis (KG6BAJ) AMPR Net IP Address Coordinator - Northern and Central California Regions (A 100% Volunteer Group) (530) 263-1595 (Home/Office) ______________________________________________
---------- This message is for the designated recipient only and MAY CONTAIN PRIVILEGED OR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of this E-mail is prohibited.
I think I generated a misunderstanding.
I took a look yesterday on the RIP data which I receive and therre was an invalid entry regarding 44.9.0.1/255.255.255.252.
According to ftp://hamradio.ucsd.edu/pub/amprhosts it belonged to wa5nmf.
I just signaled this on the list so appropriate corrections could be made.
Which happened quickly and now it is ok, and is no longer on the list.
(I think Daniel, K6DLC did the corrections - TNX)
Regards!
Marius, YO2LOJ
From: 44net-bounces+marius=yo2loj.ro@hamradio.ucsd.edu [mailto:44net-bounces+marius=yo2loj.ro@hamradio.ucsd.edu] On Behalf Of William Lewis Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 01:19 To: 44Net@hamradio.ucsd.edu Subject: Re: [44net] Gateway ip/netmask pair
Sorry:
I crossed my outgoing with Brian and Davids incoming.
You're already on it
Bill
-------------------------- Well, for starters, it looks like the address you posted here is: 44.9.0.1, and you state belongs to WA6NMF.
However, I show no such address on the network.
I do show an address for WA6NMF, but it is 44.4.9.1 not 44.9.0.1.
wa6nmf IN A 44.4.9.1 wa6nmf-1 IN A 44.4.9.2 wa6nmf-2 IN A 44.4.9.3 wa6nmf-3 IN A 44.4.9.4
Now, I also show the 44.9.x.x as a discontinued range.
I also DO NOT show any entries at Fullers for either WA6NMF or for any address starting with 44.9.x.x or any with 44.4.9.x
So, I'm curious as to where your entry came from ??
At 02:49 PM 02/22/12, you wrote:
No, I never said it belons to me. I just got an error regarding that address while checking my routing infos. It belongs to wa6nmf and should be corrected because it is wrong.
Wm Lewis (KG6BAJ) AMPR Net IP Address Coordinator - Northern and Central California Regions (A 100% Volunteer Group) (530) 263-1595 (Home/Office) ______________________________________________
_____
This message is for the designated recipient only and MAY CONTAIN PRIVILEGED OR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of this E-mail is prohibited.
On 2/22/12 10:05 PM, Marius Petrescu wrote:
I think I generated a misunderstanding.
Not really - you generated some much needed discussion, at least for this OM who is new to AMPRNet.
I took a look yesterday on the RIP data which I receive and therre was an invalid entry regarding 44.9.0.1/255.255.255.252.
Invalid because the subnet did not fall on a proper subnet boundary, or invalid because 44.9 is invalid? It's now corrected to 44.4.9.1 but some would still say it doesn't begin on a proper boundary.
According to ftp://hamradio.ucsd.edu/pub/amprhosts it belonged to wa5nmf.
Well, WA*6*NMF, but that's close.
I just signaled this on the list so appropriate corrections could be made.
Which happened quickly and now it is ok, and is no longer on the list.
Yes, now 44.4.9.1 is there through the same gateway. It is entered as 44.4.9.1/30. Perhaps some will complain because it's not 44.4.9.0/30 but 44.4.9.0 is not assigned to me.
(I think Daniel, K6DLC did the corrections - TNX)
Yes, thanks to Daniel -- he sent new addresses for me, but we're still working out the subnet issue. Or maybe it's just me who's confused.
Cheers
David WA6NMF
David Josephson wrote:
Yes, now 44.4.9.1 is there through the same gateway. It is entered as 44.4.9.1/30. Perhaps some will complain because it's not 44.4.9.0/30 but 44.4.9.0 is not assigned to me.
44.4.9.1/30 is invalid. It will not be loaded in the Linux routing table. NOS accepts it but only because it ANDs the given address with the subnet mask before putting the entry in the routing table. So after inserting 44.4.9.1/30 and looking at the resulting routing table you have 44.4.9.0/30
Rob
On 2/23/12 12:31 AM, Rob Janssen wrote:
David Josephson wrote:
Yes, now 44.4.9.1 is there through the same gateway. It is entered as 44.4.9.1/30. Perhaps some will complain because it's not 44.4.9.0/30 but 44.4.9.0 is not assigned to me.
44.4.9.1/30 is invalid. It will not be loaded in the Linux routing table.
Okay, so how to do this? The assigned addresses are 44.4.9.1 through 6. Do I just call each one a separate /32 subnet?
David
you in fact use 44.4.9.0 to 44.4.9.7 .0 is the network addres of the subnet, .7 is the bradcast address. so you have to use 44.4.9.0/29 or 44.4.9.0/255.255.255.248 routed to your gateway.
On 2/23/12 12:31 AM, Rob Janssen wrote:
David Josephson wrote:
Yes, now 44.4.9.1 is there through the same gateway. It is entered as 44.4.9.1/30. Perhaps some will complain because it's not 44.4.9.0/30 but 44.4.9.0 is not assigned to me.
44.4.9.1/30 is invalid. It will not be loaded in the Linux routing table.
Okay, so how to do this? The assigned addresses are 44.4.9.1 through 6. Do I just call each one a separate /32 subnet?
David _________________________________________ 44Net mailing list 44Net@hamradio.ucsd.edu http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
gate@ampr-gateways:~/Bin$ ./range2subnet 44.4.9.1 44.4.9.3 Your range can only be expressed by several subnets:
44.4.9.1/32 44.4.9.1 to 44.4.9.1 44.4.9.2/31 44.4.9.2 to 44.4.9.3
Alternatively you can cover the range with the single subnet:
44.4.9.0/30 44.4.9.0 to 44.4.9.3 gate@ampr-gateways:~/Bin$ ./range2subnet 44.4.9.1 44.4.9.6 Your range can only be expressed by several subnets:
44.4.9.1/32 44.4.9.1 to 44.4.9.1 44.4.9.2/31 44.4.9.2 to 44.4.9.3 44.4.9.4/31 44.4.9.4 to 44.4.9.5 44.4.9.6/32 44.4.9.6 to 44.4.9.6
Alternatively you can cover the range with the single subnet:
44.4.9.0/29 44.4.9.0 to 44.4.9.7
Jim Fuller N7VR -- http://www.n7vr.org International TCP/IP Gateways Robot Operator -- http://www.ampr-gateways.org
MTAPRS NET Server Operator -- http://www.mtaprs.net CWOP-2 -- http://www.wxqa.com IRLP Node 3398 - http://irlp.fuller.net Original ARECC contributor
-----Original Message----- From: David Josephson [mailto:wa6nmf@josephson.com] Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 1:43 AM To: 44net@hamradio.ucsd.edu Subject: Re: [44net] Gateway ip/netmask pair
On 2/23/12 12:31 AM, Rob Janssen wrote:
David Josephson wrote:
Yes, now 44.4.9.1 is there through the same gateway. It is entered as 44.4.9.1/30. Perhaps some will complain because it's not 44.4.9.0/30 but 44.4.9.0 is not assigned to me.
44.4.9.1/30 is invalid. It will not be loaded in the Linux routing table.
Okay, so how to do this? The assigned addresses are 44.4.9.1 through 6. Do I just call each one a separate /32 subnet?
David _________________________________________ 44Net mailing list 44Net@hamradio.ucsd.edu http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
gate@ampr-gateways:~/Bin$ ./range2subnet 44.4.9.1 44.4.9.3 Your range can only be expressed by several subnets:
44.4.9.1/32 44.4.9.1 to 44.4.9.1 44.4.9.2/31 44.4.9.2 to 44.4.9.3
Alternatively you can cover the range with the single subnet:
44.4.9.0/30 44.4.9.0 to 44.4.9.3 gate@ampr-gateways:~/Bin$ ./range2subnet 44.4.9.1 44.4.9.6 Your range can only be expressed by several subnets:
44.4.9.1/32 44.4.9.1 to 44.4.9.1 44.4.9.2/31 44.4.9.2 to 44.4.9.3 44.4.9.4/31 44.4.9.4 to 44.4.9.5 44.4.9.6/32 44.4.9.6 to 44.4.9.6
Alternatively you can cover the range with the single subnet:
44.4.9.0/29 44.4.9.0 to 44.4.9.7
Jim Fuller N7VR -- http://www.n7vr.org International TCP/IP Gateways Robot Operator -- http://www.ampr-gateways.org
MTAPRS NET Server Operator -- http://www.mtaprs.net CWOP-2 -- http://www.wxqa.com IRLP Node 3398 - http://irlp.fuller.net Original ARECC contributor
-----Original Message----- From: David Josephson [mailto:wa6nmf@josephson.com] Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 1:43 AM To: 44net@hamradio.ucsd.edu Subject: Re: [44net] Gateway ip/netmask pair
On 2/23/12 12:31 AM, Rob Janssen wrote:
David Josephson wrote:
Yes, now 44.4.9.1 is there through the same gateway. It is entered as 44.4.9.1/30. Perhaps some will complain because it's not 44.4.9.0/30 but 44.4.9.0 is not assigned to me.
44.4.9.1/30 is invalid. It will not be loaded in the Linux routing table.
Okay, so how to do this? The assigned addresses are 44.4.9.1 through 6. Do I just call each one a separate /32 subnet?
David _________________________________________ 44Net mailing list 44Net@hamradio.ucsd.edu http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
-
David Josephson -
Jim Fuller - N7VR -
Marius Petrescu -
marius＠yo2loj.ro
-
Rob Janssen -
William Lewis