On 21/04/18 02:18, Rob Janssen wrote:
That would be great!
You can start getting a /24 (from your country network or from that
44.190
network, that does not really matter when you are not close to another
network
like Germany) and setup your system to be on the tunnel mesh.
Then you can experiment with the software.
In parallel you can get your BGP announcement fixed.
Well, I requested a /24 from
the 44.190 block. Figured it's best to
keep all of that Internet facing stuff together. I figure it shouldn't
take too long to get the BGP announcement done, once I give my provider
the details.
That is what the whole proxy/relay thing is about.
OK, well given they've been around for years (and I actually do run a
few on the existing /28, private ones for myself and the VoIP Hurricane
Net), I was wondering if there was more to this, but certainly, being
able to spin up a heap of public proxies and relays would be a good
thing. :)
At least, when you have setup geolocation properly for your subnet.
When you carve
your subnet out of a country network this will work automatically when
your coordinator
has properly registered the country network. When he/she hasn't, your
subnet will likely
appear as located in San Diego, California. But you can fix that by
sending a couple of
registration requests to the most important geolocation providers,
easlily found by
googling for IP geolocation. This is another disaddvantage of the
44.190 space: you
will certainly have to solve this problem yourself.
Though it does mean I know
I've addressed the problem. :)
A relay is a bit different. It allows only limited functionality:
only outgoing
connections, only a single destination at a time. It is used by
default by the phone apps.
A relay can serve multiple users at the same time, but the group of
users can only
connect to different destinations. When a user of a relay wants to
connect to a
destination (e.g. a popular repeater) that has already been connected
by another user,
the relay will refuse the connection and the app will have to hop over
to another relay
to try it there. That is why it is suggested to run 10 relays at each
site.
Yeah I've found relays to be hit and miss as a user, and having more
relays available would certainly help that.
Relays are not automatically registered. They need to be manually
registered at Echolink,
who will put them in a geo DNS so users will get their address when
querying
relay.echolink.org
and being closest to your relay. Try a dig -t a
relay.echolink.org to
see what it returns
for you (most likely it will return our relays at 44.137.75.x in
Amsterdam, not really close
for you :-)
Actually, no I get different IPs
;; ANSWER SECTION:
relay.echolink.org. 300 IN A 107.23.158.3
relay.echolink.org. 300 IN A 107.23.11.57
relay.echolink.org. 300 IN A 107.23.109.134
relay.echolink.org. 300 IN A 107.23.146.139
relay.echolink.org. 300 IN A 107.23.146.140
They're in the USA, not exactly close, so it's definitely worth running
proxies here. :)
*IP Address*
107.23.158.3
*Location* United States, Virginia, Ashburn
That is what we are trying to solve by getting some
more relays
deployed. But first
you can experiment with proxies, you can turn them on or off at your
own will. Once you
have started to run relays you need to take care that they remain
running or when you
want to quit, to tell that to the Echolink people so they can take
them out of the pool,
so users will not have to try to reach them in vain (until they try
one that still works).
I've run several proxies for years, but for this new
venture, I will
have to go over to the proxy software that was mentioned here
yesterday. Should free up a bit of RAM to do so, Java is a hog! :)
--
73 de Tony VK3JED/VK3IRL
http://vkradio.com