Bob;
Can you email me off-list please using a 44-net mailbox?
--
If Microsoft intended Windows to be for ham usage,
they would have incorporated our protocols into their kernel.
73 de Brian Rogers - N1URO
email: <n1uro(a)n1uro.ampr.org>
Web: http://www.n1uro.net/
Ampr1: http://n1uro.ampr.org/
Ampr2: http://nos.n1uro.ampr.org
Linux Amateur Radio Services
axMail-Fax & URONode
AmprNet coordinator for:
Connecticut, Delaware, Maine,
Maryland, Massachusetts,
New Hampshire, Pennsylvania,
Rhode Island, and Vermont.
On 10/20/14, 10:11 PM, Bill Vodall wrote:
> The ultimate application is ... Facebook. Really!
idk, as a 30 yr old single male, I have some great things to say about pof and
tinder.
--
Bryan Fields
727-409-1194 - Voice
727-214-2508 - Fax
http://bryanfields.net
I'm presently looking for a virtual private server host to setup as a hub
for my 44net address block. it has been mentioned when I tried this in the
past that some virtualization technologies work better than others when it
comes to setting up a linux virtual machine with the tunnel mesh (then
subneting the netblock and routing it over various vpn links). i.e. xen
hvm vs xen pvm vs kvm vs vmware.... Also does anyone know a vps provider
that might bgp announce a /24 block and properly feed it to a vps on their
network?
Thanks,
Eric
AF6EP
Hi All,
After a long wait I finally have my 44 address space and my security
certificate.
Following the steps on the wiki I have set up the raspberry pi as a vpn
client and during boot I see the VPN client start.
However just a couple of questions.
Do I need to open and redirect a port on my router pointing to the
raspberry pi running the vpn and if so which port?
Once I have done that, what is the recommended method (software) that
should be installed to protect the network both to and from me?
Before I add any other software is there a way to test the functionality
of what I have done so far? at the moment all it appears to be doing is
sitting there and blinking the wireless access LED
Equipment is a raspberry B+ running off a UPS with wireless access to my
network.
Thanks in anticipation,
Regards Tony VK3API
44net-request(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu wrote:
> Subject:
> [44net] Pirate Packet Radio Node CB0AFU
> From:
> Jann Traschewski <jann(a)gmx.de>
> Date:
> 10/10/2014 09:22 AM
>
> To:
> 44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
>
>
> Hi,
>
> for those of you running a Packet Radio Link to CB0AFU: It seems it is
> *not* located in Chile but running a gateway to CB-Radio (through two
> links to Nodes in CB-Nodes in Austria).
Also watch out when stations use an NL prefix, the CB stations in the Netherlands
commonly use(d) that, so be careful to check if they are really from Alaska.
Rob
The issue is only on my DNS server. I have a zone transfer from 44.in-addr.arpa and ampr.org, so a copy of the zones are located on my BIND server at 44.60.44.3
I've been using nslookup to look at the records from multiple machines. It only occurs on certain IPs where the fourth octet is less than 10.
I'll try dig as well.
- KB3VWG
44net-request(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu wrote:
> Subject:
> [44net] Odd DNS Issue
> From:
> lleachii(a)aol.com
> Date:
> 10/10/2014 11:28 PM
>
> To:
> 44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
>
>
> All,
>
> I'm wondering if anyone else has seen this issue. I'm running BIND version 9.9.5 at 44.60.44.3. I just recently upgraded from 9.8 because I thought it would solve a very weird issue that I'm experiencing.
>
> I allow all to to lookup 44.in-addr.arpa and ampr.org; and it works. BUT, some reverse records always time out.
I have seen this many times and never have been able to solve it. Some ampr.org DNS servers time out on some PTR records.
It comes and goes, can be OK for months and then come back.
When you focus on it to debug the issue it often disappears under your hands.
No idea what it is.
Rob
On 10/11/14, 10:31 AM, Brian wrote:
> Andy et al; On Sat, 2014-10-11 at 13:18 +0100, Andy Brittain wrote:
>>> I think opening up 44 net is potentially a good idea but then we run in
>>> to trouble where RF is involved. Would we not be passing traffic that
>>> technically doesn’t fit under our license t’s&c’s?
> Absolutely. That would easier open us up to pirating (why bother get a
> license if it's freely available?) and put us in jeopardy for possible
> violation of 3rd party communications regulations depending what the 3rd
> party does.
1. There is no guarantee that 44/8 traffic is sourced from licensed radio
amateurs.
2. There is no guarantee that 44/8 traffic is suitable for use over licensed
amateur radio frequencies in $REGULATORY_DOMAIN.
The only thing there is guaranteed about 44/8 is that is must be used for bona
fide amateur radio purposes. What these purposes are, is loosely defined and
open to interpretation.
Guys, it's just IP space. The sooner we separate networking from IP space,
the better IMO.
--
Bryan Fields
727-409-1194 - Voice
727-214-2508 - Fax
http://bryanfields.net
