FYI
I am also getting rejections from the mailing list as of Friday May 10th. I still haven't received a response about the 23 tickets that are pending and unassigned - which is seems are needed to do my normal annual DNS work (BTW - which seems will require MORE tickets).
I must be honest, this is getting insane. This normally takes 1 hour - and nobody is responding to me who previously took responsibility for administering everything (i.e. Chris). This process has been the same for over 10 years, now I can't even get a response.
- can someone PLEASE respond with that's going on- again, I am willing to help/work - because I am not willing to wait for something we usually did in 1 hour or less and so
Should I just notify my government sponsor that something's going on - is ARDC defunct or something?
This is becoming pressing and if 44net is not available for Amateur use, this section needs to know.
73,
LynwoodKB3VWG
Hello, 44Net!
Last spring, ARDC put out a survey about whether we should adopt a Code
of Conduct. The vast majority (~75%) of you Agreed or Strongly Agreed
that we should. I’m pleased to share that, after many drafts, the day
has finally come!
https://www.ardc.net/about/legal/code-of-conduct/
Please give it a read, as it applies to all ARDC-hosted spaces and
projects, including this mailing list. We’d love to hear your thoughts
and questions. Feel free to respond to this thread for an open
discussion, or email conduct(a)ardc.net for thoughts you’d rather keep
private. If you are interested in having a public Q+A over Zoom, please
let us know and we’ll set one up.
As noted in one of the first paragraphs, we see this as a living
document and expect patches over time. If you have feedback or
suggestions, please send it to the email address above. Please also be
patient with us and our replies – we are working with a new committee
and will be building the plane as we fly it. The current committee
members are noted in the document.
Thanks for taking the time to review the Code of Conduct. We’re looking
forward to continuing to growing the ARDC community, with this new Code
as a solidifying block in our foundation.
73,
Rosy
--
Rosy Schechter - KJ7RYV
Executive Director
Amateur Radio Digital Communications (ARDC)
ardc.net
> I have to admit I’ve been surprised by the number of folks that
requested verification of an address that does not agree with their
license.
It would also be good to have your information correct with the FCC, or
other government agency, that issues your license.
Mick - W7CAT
----- Original Message -----
From: Dave Gingrich via 44net <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org>
To: AMPRNet Working Group <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2024 08:53:13 AM
Subject: [44net] Re: Portal Tickets - Who to contact?
>
> We are working through the tickets. We did not anticipate the huge
flood of tickets since the portal went up. We have added additional
members of the TAC to work through the Callsign and Address verification
tickets. Tickets related to other things are handled by staff.
>
> We use access to records of FCC, RAC, and QRZ.com and other online
resources we can find. But we are NOT spending any extra time trying to
match records. If we find any conflicting information, we are simply
rejecting the application. At this time, we are not going to send out
post cards or use other methods to verify addresses. Mainly due to the
costs involved. The cost of sending out a simple post card, is typically
over $2. There are hundreds of addresses needing verification.
>
> I have to admit I’ve been surprised by the number of folks that
requested verification of an address that does not agree with their
license.
>
> So if you have a pending address or callsign verification request,
make sure all the public databases agree with your request.
>
> —
> Dave K9DC, K9IP
>
>
>
> > On May 14, 2024, at 10:23, lleachii--- via 44net
<44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> wrote:
> >
> > FYI
> >
> > I am also getting rejections from the mailing list as of Friday May
10th. I still haven't received a response about the 23 tickets that are
pending and unassigned - which is seems are needed to do my normal
annual DNS work (BTW - which seems will require MORE tickets).
> >
> > I must be honest, this is getting insane. This normally takes 1
hour - and nobody is responding to me who previously took responsibility
for administering everything (i.e. Chris). This process has been the
same for over 10 years, now I can't even get a response.
> >
> > - can someone PLEASE respond with that's going on
> > - again, I am willing to help/work - because I am not willing to
wait for something we usually did in 1 hour or less and so
> >
> >
> > Should I just notify my government sponsor that something's going
on - is ARDC defunct or something?
> >
> > This is becoming pressing and if 44net is not available for Amateur
use, this section needs to know.
> > 73,
> > Lynwood
> > KB3VWG
>
>
>
>
--
Untitled Document
All,
When creating a ticket on the Portal, if you then proceed to add a file (e.g. a file of a screenshot), it deletes your text.
I screenshot my issue - hopefully it was seen. Just FYI. So not sure people can report issues.
73,
- LynwoodKB3VWG
I know that the administrators and staff are watching this list, so I am
posting this here on behalf of all those who are having issues with the
list.
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: [ARDC:44Net] Your message to 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org awaits
moderator approval
Resent-Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 09:08:36 -0700
Resent-From: nc8q-aredn(a)gelm.net
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 12:08:26 -0400
From: Chuck Gelm <nc8q-aredn(a)gelm.net>
Reply-To: 44net(a)ardc.groups.io
To: 44net(a)ardc.groups.io
On 5/14/24 11:57, 44net-bounces(a)mailman.ampr.org wrote:
> Your mail to '44net(a)mailman.ampr.org' with the subject
>
> https://portal.ampr.org/home
>
> Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
>
> The message is being held because:
>
> The message is not from a list member
>
> Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive
> notification of the moderator's decision.
Anyone:
I receive email from 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org.
Why cannot I post mail to 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org?
How is it possible to receive mail from the list and not be a member?
Chuck
--
Charles J. Hargrove - N2NOV
NYC-ARECS/RACES Citywide Radio Officer/Skywarn Coord.
NYC-ARECS/RACES Nets 441.100/136.5 PL
ARnewsline Broadcast Mon. @ 8:00PM
NYC-ARECS Weekly Net Mon. @ 8:30PM
http://www.nyc-arecs.org
NY-NBEMS Net Saturdays @ 10AM & USeast-NBEMS Net Wednesdays @ 7PM
on 7.036 Mhz USB (alt 3.536)/1500 hz waterfall spot; MFSK-16 or 32
"Information is the oxygen of the modern age. It seeps through the walls
topped
by barbed wire, it wafts across the electrified borders." - Ronald Reagan
"The more corrupt the state, the more it legislates." - Tacitus
"Molann an obair an fear" - Irish Saying
(The work praises the man.)
"No matter how big and powerful government gets, and the many services it
provides, it can never take the place of volunteers." - Ronald Reagan
Hi,
Several weeks ago I requested postal address verification via the new
portal, however it is still set as new (unassigned).
Is there some expected time-span for assignment?
I couldn't really find more info on that on this list, so I decided to
start this thread.
Thanks,
~ SP6KEK
For years, I usually make a DNS request to my coordinator and CC Chris. It takes less than 1 hours. I believe I've been waiting 3 days on 20+ tickets in the new Portal.I should note, I haven't been able to request the DNS changes - because the records are currently in an "unclaimed" status and not assigned to my call. I'm still waiting to "claim" them.Since Chirs and my coordinator have since responded to me here and off-reflector, who should I be contacting regarding tickets in the Portal?Again, I don't wish to seem impatient or entitled - especially given I now realize that others have been waiting months.Thanks and 73,LynwoodKB3VWG
-------- Original message --------From: Jim Kutsch KY2D via 44net <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> Date: 5/12/24 10:50 (GMT-05:00) To: '44Net general discussion' <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> Subject: [44net] Re: Postal address verification Unless Maine is an exception, I’m in the U.S. and my address verification request has been pending since April 12. No postcard received yet. . 73 Jim KY2D From: Dave Gingrich via 44net <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2024 9:59To: 44Net general discussion <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org>Subject: [44net] Re: Postal address verification It is much easier for the team to verify callsigns and addresses for U.S. domestic people. For some non-US locations it is nearly impossible. Tickets and any associated documents are completely deleted when they are acted upon. The team is very paranoid of leaving any personally identifiable information laying around in a database somewhere. — Dave K9DC, K9IP On May 12, 2024, at 08:58, Cara Salter via 44net <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> wrote: On 5/12/24 08:03, femsci via 44net wrote:Several weeks ago I requested postal address verification via the new portal, however it is still set as new (unassigned).Is there some expected time-span for assignment?I couldn't really find more info on that on this list, so I decided to start this thread.Interesting -- my address verification ticket was approved (from what I can tell) on the same day.Slight tangent -- is there a way to view resolved tickets? When I go to Tickets -> View My Tickets there's nothing listed.73,Cara KC1KZT
Le 05/05/2024 à 11:28, Rob PE1CHL via 44net a écrit :
> I am disappointed that the current system is focused on a completely different
> use-case than we have here
I quite agree.
For subnet 44.151 (France), I have IP creation requests pending and I
still don't know if it's possible.
For BGP France requests, I don't even know where the BGP France IPs
are since they're no longer in 44.151.
I guess we'll have to wait, so I'll wait.
That's all I can do.
😉
What would be a step forward is if coadmins could themselves create
requestor IPs and manage their associate dns/reverse dns.
Best regards,
Ludovic - F5PBG
Does ns.ardc.org have an access policy restricting traffic to only IPs with a DNS entry (i.e. Intra-AMPRNet only)?
That differs from what I've been told, so I wish ask.
I'm having a difficult time with one of my valid AMPRNet IPs and have been struggling for days. I only have success with IPS having DNS entries.
73,
LynwoodKB3VWG