Hello 44 net list,
I hope there are some people still here.
I am again trying to set up my gateway and route mine and a few others blocks of 44.x addresses.
I have a static IP address at home and have set this up in the portal, however I am monitoring the linux pc by tcpdump and I am not seeing any RIP2 broadcast being sent to me.
>From my previous testing I can confirm the Linux PC is in the DMZ and no firewall, it responds to ICMP ping packets too.
My public IP is 92.234.91.114
Is anyone able to help me out here or is there a way to force a rip2 broadcast (how often are these sent?)
Looking forward to catching up with you all soon
Best regards
James Preece M0JFP / 2e1avx
James Preece | Global Services
D 01932 582 063 M 07584 480 694
f5.com<https://www.f5.com> | synthesis.f5.com<https://synthesis.f5.com>
[Twitter]<https://twitter.com/f5networks>[LinkedIn]<http://www.linkedin.com/company/f5-networks>[Facebook]<https://www.facebook.com/f5networksinc>[YouTube]<http://www.youtube.com/f5networksinc>[DevCentral]<https://devcentral.f5.com/>
[F5 Logo and Tagline]
Greetings..
I'm running a Windows based BPQ32 BBS. John Wiseman GB8BPQ has made it
possible that we can use the AMPRnet. I have gotten my 44.135.192.160/29
listed in the Encap. What I need is to add four more.
va7dgp.ampr.org 44.135.192.160
Subnet
va7tsa.ampr.org 44.135.192.161
bpq.va7dgp.ampr.org 44.135.192.162
bpq.va7tsa.ampr.org 44.135.192.163
I see a menu to add a Subnet but I don't the capability to add the above.
I've bombarded Luc ve3jpl email. He must be on vacation or away..
I know we are all Hams/Volunteers
73
Don va7dgp
*Don Poaps*
*New Westminster, BC*
*VA7DGP*
James,
A few of us have web based tools that will allow you to ping. Which
for testing purposes is the same as receiving RIP as it all rides on
protocol 4 (ipencap).
http://44.92.21.1/tools/php-ping/php-ping.php
Dear colleagues!
From the information on the site wiki.ampr.org, implies that the
construction of the AMPR-Net node require support of protocol RIPv2.
At the same time, from the same source, it follows that the standard
systems with support RIPv2 are not suitable for this case.
From this we can conclude that RIPv2 used in an unusual way.
*Where can I get an introduction to this non-standard system that allows
to understand the technical sense?*
Looking archive mailing list, I received some fragmentary information.
I realized that RIP is not used to compare alternative routes for
efficiency, but for accounting for the dynamic addresses.
However, all the circumstances I not grasped.
I think that every first administrator, thinking through the design of
the node, asks this question. And surely, somewhere there must be a
document drawn up for those interested.
I was very surprised, when not to find the answer to this question in
the FAQ.
If he's still there, and I was looking bad, forgive me, and specify its
location.
If not - please help me and tell me about this non-standart solution.
Advance very grateful.
--
73! Yours faithfully,
Rihard RU3DSH.
> Subject:
> Re: [44net] ENCAP ro BGP
> From:
> Steve L <kb9mwr(a)gmail.com>
> Date:
> 08/19/2015 05:31 AM
>
> To:
> "44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu" <44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu>
>
>
> Brian Kantor,
>
> Concerning hosts with no DNS entries can only use the IPIP mesh system.
>
> Couldn't this be tweaked at UCSD to allow only 44net traffic for hosts
> with no DNS entries? Thus letting BGP'd 44 hosts be able to
> communicate with IPIP 44 hosts regardless of DNS entries?
What would be the advantage?
Why not just register a DNS entry for any address you want to use?
In fact, I constructed the same filter as UCSD has in our gateway (which is BGP routed),
just to cut out most of the crap before it enters the radio network. Anyone who wants to
use an address can always have it registered.
Rob
Brian Kantor,
Concerning hosts with no DNS entries can only use the IPIP mesh system.
Couldn't this be tweaked at UCSD to allow only 44net traffic for hosts
with no DNS entries? Thus letting BGP'd 44 hosts be able to
communicate with IPIP 44 hosts regardless of DNS entries?
And of course if there is a DNS entry then (like now) allow
general/all inbound traffic.
Just a thought, not sure if it raises any other issues.
Steve, KB9MWR
marius at yo2loj.ro wrote:
>John,
>
>Yes, you should be able to send encapsulated data via amprgw and get the
>correct replies, but only for specific BGP announced and registered
>subnets.
>
>Arbitrary 44net targets not in those BGP announced networks are NOT
>forwarded via amprgw, and only DNS registered hosts will be able to use
>the gateway (as you correctly assume).
>
>Hosts with no DNS entries can only use the IPIP mesh system, since there
>is usually no check for that criteria on the gateways, and any subnet
>match is accepted.
>
>Marius, YO2LOJ
Bill,
I don't know what Lynwood has, but as a winter project I was going to
attempt the same thing on a Netgear WNR3500Lv2 running OpenWRT.
It too has: 5 GigE Ports, and a USB 2.0 Port
128 MB NAND flash and 128 MB RAM
Steve, KB9MWR
Also,
I forgot one step
- I created a bridge interface between tunl0 and a new VLAN, I named it
'amprnet'. I assigned the bridge 44.60.44.1.
- Lynwood
KB3VWG
Dani,
That is EXACTLY what I'm seeking...!
Has anyone compiled ampr-ripd v1.13 for MIPS 74Kc - Linux?
- Lynwood
KB3VWG
On 08/13/2015 03:00 PM, 44net-request(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu wrote:
> My router happens to be PPC instead of the more common MIPS. If your
> router is also PPC by chance, then I can send you the ampr-ripd binary
> to save you the process of cross-compiling.
