44net

44net@mailman.ampr.org

3196 discussions

BGP changes for 44net allocations?
by Jim MacKenzie 19 May '21

19 May '21

Hi, I have a 44net/AMPRnet allocation that had the appropriate paperwork done with Brian Kantor before he passed. This subnet has been delegated to me for a few years and I am using a VPS provider to advertise it via BGP so that it is accessible on the public Internet. My provider is selling to another company that is unlikely to continue this arrangement. Also, it seems my five-year contract has expired so it needs renewing anyway. :) Who is handling this documentation now? I'd like to arrange updated documentation so that I can get whatever new provider to sign on. Also, if anyone has any suggestions for providers with data centres in Canada (or with low latency to prairie Canada, at least), I'm all ears. I have found a prospect in Toronto and am waiting to hear back, but it is far from definite. Much appreciated. 73 Jim VE5EV

6 6

Presentation to RATPAC
by John D. Hays 18 May '21

18 May '21

A recent presentation to RATPAC by ARDC (Rosy and Phil). https://vimeo.com/549072371 -- John D. Hays Kingston, WA K7VE / WRJT-215

1 0

bgp router setup
by eric.fort.listmail＠fortconsulting.org 18 May '21

18 May '21

a few weeks ago somone linked to a really good youtube video on setting up a vm as a bgp router with bird and open vpn. now I cant find the post, the video or the link. could someone please repost this or at least send me the link. I want to get 44.18.28/22 routed as I have a network which it was ontained for now needing built. bgp is working TO my vm at vultr but I need to get the vpn side working out to the sites. Eric af6ep

5 9

The utilization of 44/8
by Antonios Chariton (daknob) 17 May '21

17 May '21

Hello fellow 44net users, Yesterday I posted an analysis of the utilization of 44/8 on my blog, and you can find that here: https://blog.daknob.net/mapping-44net/ <https://blog.daknob.net/mapping-44net/> I thought you may find it interesting to read, and it also includes a map of the entire IPv4 and IPv6 Internet as a bonus so you can compare our usage to other parts of it. A note is that currently Germany's 44.148/15 already has very similar utilization to that of one of the most dense networks, 185/8 (comparison with 185.148/15): https://blog.daknob.net/content/images/2021/05/44-de-185-eu.png <https://blog.daknob.net/content/images/2021/05/44-de-185-eu.png> . According to the ping data, HAMNET accounts for over 75% of the hosts alive during the measurement, so that's a great example of what is possible for the entire network! I'll be happy to hear any thoughts and comments you may have on the topic. Antonis SV2OIY

4 7

MIT Radome Re: 44Net Digest, Vol 10, Issue 74
by Ken 08 May '21

08 May '21

Very interesting article and nice tribute to Brian K. Good to see strong support from ARDC. Great job! Sent from my iPad > On May 7, 2021, at 1:00 PM, 44net-request(a)mailman.ampr.org wrote: > > Send 44Net mailing list submissions to > 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > 44net-request(a)mailman.ampr.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > 44net-owner(a)mailman.ampr.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of 44Net digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. MIT Radome -- ARDC Grant (John D. Hays) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 10:31:24 -0700 > From: "John D. Hays" <john(a)hays.org> > To: AMPRNet working group <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> > Subject: [44net] MIT Radome -- ARDC Grant > Message-ID: > <CAN77r3ya9MK4Ljs0XGfeE4YXCUp8kHugG7BmL-unTjMW9+LHNA(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > https://news.mit.edu/2021/saving-the-mit-radome-0507 > > -- > John D. Hays > Kingston, WA > K7VE > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > 44Net mailing list > 44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org > https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net > > > ------------------------------ > > End of 44Net Digest, Vol 10, Issue 74 > *************************************

1 0

MIT Radome -- ARDC Grant
by John D. Hays 08 May '21

08 May '21

https://news.mit.edu/2021/saving-the-mit-radome-0507 -- John D. Hays Kingston, WA K7VE

3 2

Renumbering networks (BGP announced only?)
by Magne Mæhre 03 May '21

03 May '21

Hi all. Just got a notice from our network person that he'd received an email from Chris notifying him of a renumbering of our allocated segments. Since I couldn't remember a discussion here (please excuse me if this has been discussed before), I just wanted to raise a few question - out of curiosity. We currently have a few /24 allocations within the 44.141.0.0/16 regional block (Norway). I think two or three of the /24 blocks are published via BGP. In the email, we're requested to renumber, and move the BGP announced segments over to the 44.31.0.0/16 (in the US regional /9 block). I don't think we've heard anything about the other addresses in 44.141.0.0/16 which are not BGP announced? I guess I'm curious about the rationale behind this decision? I think efficiency was stated, but I really can't see any big difference in having a /24 announced either here or there? Since we don't have the same upstream providers as our neighboring nets, there won't be any aggregation benefits (?). Is the plan to also deprecate the national and regional allocations? For our part, quite a few of the devices with 44-addresses are on mountain tops (beacons, remote receivers, sensors, etc.), but we have a 4 month window, starting in a months time, to get up there and do the renumbering. No big deal.. Just curious what the thoughts are.. --Magne / LA1BFA

1 0

contact info for aprs2.net pool
by Colin Bodor 03 May '21

03 May '21

Hello everyone. Maybe a long shot but figure there is some cross over. I setup an instance of APRSC in a "very good" location network wise (internet exchange, very low regional latency, no other APRS tier 2 servers close latency wise, data center, virtualized, multihomed etc - this is my day job, I run AS 55016 and announce 44net addresses via BGP, of which one is being used for APRSC). Anyway, would like to reach out to the folks at aprs2.net and see if I can get my server added to the noam.aprs2.net pool - pending meeting their requirements of course. I cant find any contact information however about who would be the correct person to contact about that, or the process to apply. Hoping someone here can help me get in touch? -Colin / VA6CCB

2 1

Re: [44net] JNOS.VA2OM.AMPR.ORG NNTP & AXIP services.
by VE2PKT 02 May '21

02 May '21

Good day, This message is for all of you using the NNTP on VA2OM, due to a misunderstanding in gateway configurations I had to do some changes. Now you can access the NNTP using jnos.ve2pkt.ampr.org port 119, if you like to POP some of your mail, you need to contact me for a access. if you have any question, feel free to ask by sending a message to: va2om(a)jnos.ve2pkt.ampr.org This is the same for all of you who had and AXIP linlk to VA2OM. please contact me -- 73 de Jean, VA2OM / VE2PKT

1 0

Re: [44net] TAC + 44net @ T+2 years
by lleachii＠aol.com 01 May '21

01 May '21

All, I'm actually learning a lot. Some I heard before; but didn't understand the implication - (not saying the research is/was bad). I'd simply say (as I read more on this topic) - that it wouldn't make any sense for an NGN44 Group to finally suggest something and it's not compatible with the "owner's" desire for the block/network. I digress. 73, - Lynwood KB3VWG

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

44net